Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Tue, Jul 18, 2006 07:27 PM UTC:
I have added two new sets of similar games. These involve some of my games.
One set is Storm the Ivory Tower and Yáng Qí. They are no more similar than
almost any two Chess variants, but they are both based on Chinese Chess and
were created by the same inventor. When I was voting, I was feeling that
although I would like either game in the tournament, I didn't really feel
the need to have both in the tournament. In particular, I really want Storm
the Ivory Tower in the tournament, and I would want Yáng Qí in only if
Storm the Ivory Tower didn't make it.

The other set is Crazyhouse and Shatranji. Both are similar to but better
than Chessgi, but overall, I think Shatranji is the superior game, because
the less powerful pieces of Shatranj are better suited to a game with drops
than the more powerful pieces of Chess are.

I will also recommend rejoining Great Shatranj and Grand Shatranj into one
group, and adding Modern Shatranj to the Mir Chess group. I would be
interested in having either Great or Grand Shatranj in the tournament but
don't feel much need to include both. I think the chance of one making it
into the tournament is better if they are grouped together. Likewise,
Modern Shatranj seems to have much the same appeal as Mir Chess. But I
will let their inventors weigh in on this before making these changes.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Preference Poll for Third Game Courier Tournament

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.