Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 10:01 AM UTC:
> Umm... Here's a stupid question: Cannon to F3, couldn't the 
> rook just capture the cannon, as would happen in orthodox xianqi?

Yet another one who doesn't know where F3 is??? (But at least you got the nature of the question right! ;-) )

But seriously, I don't think this is a viable game. Obviously the mate-in-one problem would have to be solved, but the material imbalance is huge, and even when the rules would be changed to convert the instant mate into an instant Queen-for-Cannon trade, the Xiangqi side should get its *** whipped. So fixing the mate-in-one problem by giving the FIDE side the first move is not really an option.

An interesting way to connect the 9-wide board half to the 8-wide half would be to offset them half by a file (Xiangqi is supposed to be played on the intersections, after all), and add the rule that you should 'keep right' when crossing the River. That would connect the XQ central file (blocked by the Pawn) to the FIDE King file, and the King would be safe. (So you would move a Cannon to d3 to gain a Queen in stead, which would become an obligatory starting move. But you could still choose which Cannon to move there, so it still makes sense to have that move be part of the game.)

By having the square-to-gridpoint connections different for up-rank and down-rank moves, you get the interesting effect that the color-boundedness of Bishops disappears: they can change sqare color by crossing the River, and then crossing back!

connectivity on down-rank moves:
  r n b q k b n r
  p p p p p p p p
  . . . . . . . .
  . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
P . P . P . P . P
. C . . . . . C .
. . . . . . . . .
R H E A K A E N R

Connectivity on up-rankmoves:
r n b q k b n r
p p p p p p p p
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
P . P . P . P . P
. C . . . . . C .
. . . . . . . . .
R H E A K A E N R

Edit Form

Comment on the page Xiangqi vs Orthodox Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.