[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments by makov333
'Why allowing null moves? Isn't that just like a 'pass'?' Yes, it's something like that. But player must have an open line, a rook or a queen for that. If you have this (Made this specially) - why not? Logically, this move is correct on this board. My board doesn't look so pretty! 'The one game I played, against Graeme Neatham, I was in a constant state of panic.' Joe, it's for the first time. Rooks and Queen are so mobile. Bishops are not mobile as in Chess. If they come from one part, it's difficult to replace them to other part for attack. Rooks need an open line. I think the game is more drawish, than Chess. My opinion on pieces: Knight - 2 pawns Bishop - 2 pawns Rook - 6 pawns Queen - 9 pawns
Just made a board for Circular Chess. Decided to play: 1) with en-passant 2) with null moves allowed
Does Bare King counts as a win in HyperModern Shatranj?
Thanks. Fergus, I can playtest Circular Chess preset with you when it will be ready.
I have this problem too. http://play.chessvariants.org/pbm/play.php?game=Almost+Chess&log=makov333-cvgameroom-2009-251-884
What castling rule is for Modern Carrera's Chess? 3->Rook?
Clarification of rules by Peter Gelman. Flight: Movement From the Cloud Boards 'A disk starting movement on a Cloud square must note the color of the square first; it may fly to any empty square on the Earth board of the same color, or the other Cloud’s square of the same color if it is empty.' For example, Red Monkey King is on R-101. From R-101 Monkey King can fly to all White Earth squares: a1, a3, a5, a7; b2, b4, b6, b8, etc. Also to White Goblin Cloud square R-100. So, a player can move piece from his Cloud to opponent territory (5-8 ranks in this example).
'Lol, Fergus, I am often known to take 12 to 24 days to make a move. My typical game plays with a grace time of 3 weeks and no other time at all.' I can make a move several months. But this tournament is not for such games. So, you must make moves quicker than usually.
Nice variant because of it's Old Monkey weaker than King.
As Mats said: 'If it's an introductory tournament to chess variants then one should perhaps have fewer rounds. It's easier for people to sign up if it's not that time-demanding.' I agree with this. 'if anyone doesn’t like the games, or what not, they are free to withdraw from the tournament.' I think it's not your problem.
18 games per all players?! Per one player 18 games probably is too long.
'18 rounds is very ambitious. If it's an introductory tournament to chess variants then one should perhaps have fewer rounds. It's easier for people to sign up if it's not that time-demanding.' Agree. 12 looks better. 'I change my choice for Euchess since it also can be useful as an introductory variant.' Hm... What sense to play two variants with chancellors and cardinals only? (Capa variant and Euchess). Both are large variants. Yes, Euchess is larger, but main idea is the same. Symmetric chess was interesting because of introducing bishop-conversion rule.
'...and it should be programmed on Game Courier before the start of the tournament. I am able to program the rules for games you may not be able to, but if I can't do it, and no one else can, then the game won't make it.' You need to read more attentive. Nobody told that we'll play presets without rules enforcement. Question is who will program the rules?! As I understand Fergus can do this.
On Circular Chess. 'Also, there is no en-passant capture. (This was because the inventor didn't like this rule.)' http://www.chessvariants.org/shape.dir/circular.html Ha-ha! Lol! En-passant is a important thing in chess. In Circular Chess where row of pawn is 4 not eight it's more important thing against drawish wall of pawns. There is no problem do you like it or not. It's an important rule. So, I cannot agree with the inventor of Circular Chess. But it's not a big problem. We can play it without en-passant or with it... It's playable.
'Anyhow, I thought Jose proposed Modern Chess a while ago.' He proposed Ajax Chess or Ajax Random Chess.
'Vitya: Modern chess was suggested in this posting.' It was said about Shatranj. Modern Shatranj. 'I think it’s perfectly fair to demand anyone who wants their variant played here to either make a full rules-enforcing game courier preset' I'm not a programmer. It's not a big problem for Fergus, I hope.
If we play Capa variant there is no big sense to play Modern Chess.
Joe, I know about Modern Chess. But it's a new Sam offer, not our first suggestions. Am I right?
'Looking at this list, the next three people who make a game courier preset enforcing the rules will get their game in this tournament.' Ha-ha! :))) LOL!!!
Sam, lol. I've never seen in this theme - Modern Chess. What are you talking about? Modern Shatranj?
'The reason is that it is too easy to force the amazons to get traded off early on, and then you find yourself playing what amounts to a standard chess position with queens traded off.' We can play it and I can show you that is not easy to force...
Mirari, am I right that Amazon Chess is played at BrainKing?
Mirari, looks like you not a beginner in chess variants. :) If I understand correct Fergus idea is not in originality of variants, but as introduction to chessvariants... to main ideas of many variants.
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.