[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
This game looks interesting, and the relative piece values make for several unequal yet fair trades. How did you calculate them?
I usually use 3 different methods of assessing piece values and then take an average. Here though I must admit to merely rounding the values calculated by Zillions of Games.
I like the new tessellation that this variant uses; there are so many possible tessellations out there, yet most Chess variants use a plain square tessellation. Only sometimes do we use a plain hexagonal tessellation; far rarer is something radical such as a board using triangles, parachess [1], or this board. I applaud you for trying out a new tessellation! - Sam [1] http://www.chessvariants.com/shape.dir/parachess.html
3 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.
This game looks interesting, and the relative piece values make for several unequal yet fair trades. How did you calculate them?
Do you people think The trade potential would go up if there was a pawn with value 1.5? hehe, don't mind me much, I just like numbers a bit too much, hehe. Seems a good game. :)