The site has moved to a new server, and there are now some issues to fix. Please report anything needing fixing with a comment to the homepage.

The Chess Variant Pages

[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Later Reverse Order Earlier
Byzantine Chess Theory. Towards the theory of Byzantine Chess.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Vitya Makov wrote on 2010-01-20 UTCGood ★★★★
Good work. I cannot agree that Elephant in worth more than 1 pawn on Circular board. Bishop isn't so strong on square board or on circular board. Also a square where piece stands differs from squares attacked by this piece. I cannot say that square where the piece stands is fully controlled by this piece. My opinion on exchanges: 2N + Ferz ~ Rook F<2P

Fergus Duniho wrote on 2003-08-11 UTC
I came across this page while looking for the official notation of Circular Chess. In reference to the notation described here, the author says 'We do not know how the Constantinople chessplayers denoted the squares, but the above notation used in Circular Chess (the modern version of Byzantine Chess) looks natural and convenient.' I most emphatically disagree with his evaluation of this notation. The system of notation described here is like putting a square peg in a round hole. It's the wrong tool for the job. The notation for a circular variant ought to use polar coordinates, not cartesian coordinates. What this system has done is try to map the cartesian coordinates from a regular Chess board onto a circular board. In my PBM preset for Circular Chess, I offer a much simpler coordinate system. I simply treat rings as ranks and pie slices as files. Each pie slice has a letter, going from a to p in a clockwise order, and the rings are numbered from 1 to 4, going in an outward direction.

Jianying Ji wrote on 2002-08-20 UTCExcellent ★★★★★
thanks, as all the graphics works now!!

Jianying Ji wrote on 2002-08-20 UTCGood ★★★★
A great and detailed page. However the images are not visible due to some 
mal formed link addresses ie the wrong slash being used. nonetheless the
contents are very useful

4 comments displayed

Later Reverse Order Earlier

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.