[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
It's me... Probably 4 powers of rook is silly, but, maybe, have still 3 powers of rook, but 4 powers of bishop and knight?
Good, but needs another rules for castling. What about this: impossible to give castling to pieces on 2nd rank; castling is normal for pieces in rooks' squares; when castling with piece on queen's knight's square, king moves two squares; with piece on queen's bishop's and king's knight's square, king moves on square; king swaps position with adjecent piece. Or use castling rules from Fischer's random chess or castling like here: http://www.chessvariants.org/diffsetup.dir/castling_960.html Also, why there is no en-passant? I can suggest rules of duble and triple step and en-passant from Omega chess (of course, there are many variants of duble step and en-passant, why not use one of them?). Also i can suggest to have 4 powers of rook, bishop and knight, but possible to use only 18 of powers (counting castling power).
2 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.