[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
Stiles' Fox is doubly bent rider, two-path to only some of its squares.
I have been thinking further about pieces of this kind. It occurs to me that the Fox can be seen as a compound of two weaker pieces - a 'samewise' Fox that always makes two left or two right turns, and a 'contrariwise' Fox that always makes one of each. The first shares the Bishop's destinations but by a less direct route, the second those of the Lama (Dabbaba then Bishop) but with two turns instead of one. I take the 45° nature of the turn to apply equally in 3d, so that on both cubic and hex-prism boards the Fox still moves in only one plane in each move and so still has the same two components (but with more pairs of opposites than just left/right). The forward-only piece, the Foxcub, is always contrariwise. The Hyena, with 1:1:1 rather than 1:0:0 steps toppoing and tailing the Bishop section, would similarly have Samewise and Contrariwise components, but so would its forward-only version (Hyenacub?).
I have now included this piece in a subvariant of my 4 Linepiece Fusion.
This resolves the anomaly of it being in the Piececlopedia but not
qualifying. In the process I have also thrown in some names for compounds
of this kind of piece.
Note the usage of the names wolf and fox in Wolf chess. --J%org Knappen
This page violates the Piececlopedia guidelines and so should be removed. The Piececlopedia is reserved for pieces that have previously appeared in games or fairy chess problems.
6 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.
Shouldn't move option 2) include a lame dabbaba move?