Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To H. G. Muller wrote on Thu, Oct 9, 2008 10:49 AM UTC:I don't quite understand the description of the system you give on the IAGO site. It seems there is a typo in the captures description. Could you give examples of how you would denote a Checkers capture, a Go capture of a chain of 3 stones, and a reversi move that flipped 3 stones. How would you denote a capture in the Checkers variant which stacks the tompost chip of captured stacks under the stack that captures them? (e.g. if I have a stack of 2 white chips on top of 3 black chips, and would jump with this stack over a stack that had 1 black chip on top of a white chip, taking away the black one, leaving behind the white one, landing on its target square as a stack of 2 white chips on top of 4 back chips.) Another point: To call this 'a FEN for movement' is truly ridiculous. FEN means Forsyth-Edwards notation, and neither Forsyth nor Edwards have anything to do with it. It is a bit like calling the wheels of your car 'Dollar bills for driving'. Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID Standards does not match any item.