Check out Janggi (Korean Chess), our featured variant for December, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Sun, Mar 11, 2012 02:28 AM UTC:
I had a script count the number of times each rating has been used in the
comments. Here are the results:

Array
(
    [Good] => 2052
    [None] => 21618
    [Excellent] => 3167
    [Poor] => 511
    [] => 90
    [Average] => 156
    [BelowAverage] => 76
)

I then thought to do the same thing on only Game pages. Here are the
results of that:

Array
(
    [Good] => 1507
    [None] => 9939
    [Excellent] => 2068
    [Poor] => 342
    [BelowAverage] => 43
    [Average] => 69
    [] => 19
)

Whichever results I use, the same pattern emerges. Discounting None and
null, Excellent is used most often, followed by Good and Poor. BelowAverage
and Average are used much less than these three. This supports the idea
that most raters are really employing a three-point scale rather than a
five-point scale. This lends support to using the 'Dislike, Like,
Favorite' scale over the five-point scale currently in use with the
comments.

Judging from this data, I also think that Excellent has been overused. More
games have been rated Excellent than the sum of all the other ratings. A
rating of Excellent should be reserved for the very best games, and if it
were, it would be a less common rating. The way I want to use Favorite may
curb this tendency. One thing I want to do with favorites is list each
user's favorites on his information page. When selecting a game as
favorite, the user would understand that he is also adding it to a viewable
list of favorites, and he may choose his rating with a view to this.

Edit Form

You may not post a new comment, because ItemID Cookies does not match any item.