Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier Reverse Order Later
[Subject Thread] [Add Response]
David Paulowich wrote on Sun, Oct 14, 2007 03:54 PM UTC:

Fusion Chess III makes the following rules changes to Fergus Duniho's Fusion Chess. [1] Allow triple fusion. [2] Replace Knights with Nightriders and Queens with Rook, Bishop, Nightrider triple compounds. [3] Limit all compound pieces to single-step moves, so the 'Queen' moves and captures like a Wazir, Ferz, Knight compound. [4] Strengthen the illegal compounds rule to forbid any compound that fails to add a new movement capability. Thus King+Nightrider is the only royal compound permitted, as it has the added ability to move and capture like a Knight (single-step Nightrider). As in Fusion Chess, the original King cannot be split.


David Paulowich wrote on Sun, Oct 14, 2007 03:59 PM UTC:

'You know, the thought occurred to me that if the characteristics of pieces changed when they fuse or fission, then check could be given by a piece that was part of a compound that could not give check...' - Joe Joyce [2007-10-10]

This comment, raises some interesting possibilities. In the following diagram [White] has Rook+Nightrider compound (h8), Bishop (h1), King (b1). [Black] has King (a8), Rook (b7). Splitting the Nightrider off by moving h8-b5 blocks the check by the Rook (b7) and checkmates with the Rook (h8).

k . . . . . . X
. r . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 
. . . . . . . .
. K . . . . . B

Abdul-Rahman Sibahi wrote on Sun, Oct 14, 2007 05:32 PM UTC:
The idea sounds great. I have a question though (and two suggestions.)

The question is : During a Fission move, for example, when the Nightrider
moves away from the Rook+Nightrider, is it limited to a single step ?

Update: I looked at the position you posted and found my answer, but is the position legal?

(After reconsidering, Black's last move was probably Rxb7 +.)

The two suggestions :

1. Replace the Nightrider with a Rose. The Rose strikes me, personally, as
a more natural extension of the Knight.

2. Compounds of two pieces, instead of being restricted to one step, they
can be absolute halflings. This has two implications :
  a. a Halfling Rose is not how Betza defines it, but rather how he
     defines normal halflings. If the Rose, along its normal line of
     movement, must stop at a certain square (because of edges or
     because of itself, not counting other pieces,) then a Halfling
     Rose moves half that distance rounded up.
  b. a King may not be involved in triple combounds. Double compounds
     are okay. (Retaining some of Fusion Chess's flavour.)

3 comments displayed

Earlier Reverse Order Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.