Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To George Duke wrote on Thu, Jun 26, 2008 06:52 PM UTC:Of course with Falcon Chess 8x10 we disagree any '8x10 is dead', but to contrary the obvious logical expansion, without ruining Pawn play, and still below Shogi's 81 and Xiangqi's 90. 8x10 is surely correct rather than 10x10, but who can definitely rule out Courier 8x12? Thousands of oddball forms do not hide logical evolutions, as happened between Shatranj and Modern -- be they today Fischer Random, specific Carrera arrays, Falcon, Mastodon, or saving Mutator on 8x8 such as later-introduced pieces. I mentioned more than once standard ubiquitous European draughts boards 10x10 at Chessboard Math and ProblemThemes. This thread became topic of board sizes 64,80,100 generally. Sam Trenholme, who started it, is noted for his own mid-1990's website of pre-existing Chess forms, not encouraging proliferation for its own sake. We would be interested where any 80's are being played besides Brainking, in order eventually to seek open inclusion of Falcon Chess there. Jeremy Good's absence removes the only Falcon Chess advocate besides ourselves developing work-ups. What about the mere existence of new Play servers without specific addresses being named? Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID 8x10 looks dead does not match any item.