Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To George Duke wrote on Thu, Aug 21, 2008 06:01 PM UTC:We want to investigate why so many '9x9' Chesses are excellent notwithstanding prototype Shogi(9x9) being terrible. First in spirit of proliferation, we have invented 9x9 Baseball Chess. The starting line-up: LeftFld/3rdBase/Shortstop/Catcher/Pitcher/CtrFld/2ndBase/1stBase/RightFld Rook / Knight/ Bishop / King / Queen / Cardnl / Bishop/ Knight/ Rook __a______b_______c_______d_______e_______f________g_______h______i____ From a1 to i1, the players are nothing but a Carrera derivative [that Hutnik asks for] omitting Champion(RN) behind 9 Pawns. Each piece has a corresponding ''nonant.'' Quadrant (1/4) and sextant (1/6 usually of a circle) are well understood. Mathematical ''nonant''(1/9) on 9x9 would be a 3x3 subset of squares. Obviously the nonants fall into the pattern as to the right, LF___CF___RF so that the Pitcher has ''control'' where Pi(=Qu) SS___PI___2B herself situates on any of squares d4, d5, 3B___CA___1B d6, e4, e5, e6, f4, f5, f6. Finding the corresponding 3x3 matrix, Right Field (=Rook) has nonant g9, h9, i9, g8, h8, i8, g7, h7, i7; and so on. Only FirstBase(=N) and ThirdBase(=N) are initially in their nonant at array position. The Baseball scheme throws off a family of untold millions of games. Differing effects may depend on whether the piece(s) must be within its(their) nonant or not. Here are only 3 complete games: Baseball(a): Any piece actually within its nonant immobilizes adjacent opponent's pieces (after Ultima). (b) Any piece on one of its nonant's 9 squares reduces (after Altair) adjacent opponent's piece(s) to one square only. (c) Any piece so within his nonent is immune to capture. Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID ChessboardMath3 does not match any item.