George Duke wrote on Thu, Aug 21, 2008 06:01 PM UTC:
We want to investigate why so many '9x9' Chesses are excellent
notwithstanding prototype Shogi(9x9) being terrible. First in spirit of
proliferation, we have invented 9x9 Baseball Chess. The starting line-up:
LeftFld/3rdBase/Shortstop/Catcher/Pitcher/CtrFld/2ndBase/1stBase/RightFld
Rook / Knight/ Bishop / King / Queen / Cardnl / Bishop/ Knight/ Rook
__a______b_______c_______d_______e_______f________g_______h______i____
From a1 to i1, the players are nothing but a Carrera derivative [that Hutnik asks for] omitting
Champion(RN) behind 9 Pawns. Each piece has a corresponding
''nonant.'' Quadrant (1/4) and sextant (1/6 usually of a circle) are
well understood. Mathematical ''nonant''(1/9) on 9x9 would be a 3x3 subset
of squares. Obviously the nonants fall into the pattern
as to the right, LF___CF___RF
so that the Pitcher has ''control'' where Pi(=Qu) SS___PI___2B
herself situates on any of squares d4, d5, 3B___CA___1B
d6, e4, e5, e6, f4, f5, f6. Finding the corresponding 3x3 matrix, Right Field (=Rook) has nonant g9, h9, i9, g8, h8, i8, g7, h7, i7; and so on.
Only FirstBase(=N) and ThirdBase(=N) are initially in their nonant at
array position. The Baseball scheme throws off a family of untold millions of
games. Differing effects may depend on whether the piece(s) must be within
its(their) nonant or not. Here are only 3 complete games: Baseball(a): Any piece actually within its nonant immobilizes adjacent opponent's pieces (after Ultima). (b) Any piece on one of its nonant's 9 squares reduces (after Altair) adjacent opponent's piece(s) to one square only. (c) Any piece so within his nonent is immune to capture.
We want to investigate why so many '9x9' Chesses are excellent notwithstanding prototype Shogi(9x9) being terrible. First in spirit of proliferation, we have invented 9x9 Baseball Chess. The starting line-up: LeftFld/3rdBase/Shortstop/Catcher/Pitcher/CtrFld/2ndBase/1stBase/RightFld Rook / Knight/ Bishop / King / Queen / Cardnl / Bishop/ Knight/ Rook __a______b_______c_______d_______e_______f________g_______h______i____ From a1 to i1, the players are nothing but a Carrera derivative [that Hutnik asks for] omitting Champion(RN) behind 9 Pawns. Each piece has a corresponding ''nonant.'' Quadrant (1/4) and sextant (1/6 usually of a circle) are well understood. Mathematical ''nonant''(1/9) on 9x9 would be a 3x3 subset of squares. Obviously the nonants fall into the pattern as to the right, LF___CF___RF so that the Pitcher has ''control'' where Pi(=Qu) SS___PI___2B herself situates on any of squares d4, d5, 3B___CA___1B d6, e4, e5, e6, f4, f5, f6. Finding the corresponding 3x3 matrix, Right Field (=Rook) has nonant g9, h9, i9, g8, h8, i8, g7, h7, i7; and so on. Only FirstBase(=N) and ThirdBase(=N) are initially in their nonant at array position. The Baseball scheme throws off a family of untold millions of games. Differing effects may depend on whether the piece(s) must be within its(their) nonant or not. Here are only 3 complete games: Baseball(a): Any piece actually within its nonant immobilizes adjacent opponent's pieces (after Ultima). (b) Any piece on one of its nonant's 9 squares reduces (after Altair) adjacent opponent's piece(s) to one square only. (c) Any piece so within his nonent is immune to capture.