Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To Rich Hutnik wrote on Sat, Oct 11, 2008 09:08 PM UTC:H.G, thanks for the message. I just had a few comments: 1. Why do we need to worry about having each website give up their look and feel? Why can't we have the back end be standardized? 2. Pretty much, I would agree hat an 'additional channel' approach would be wise to be created and added, and that is what I would like the standards to help lead to, and help regulate how it works. This channel could be added to programs out there, such as WinBoard, or even the program 'Cyberboard' which is used now for wargames. The channel could also be used to enable AIs to communicate with Websites, so people specializing in AI can have their AI work with websites, and they no have to worry about having to code GUIs and so on. Of course all parties would need to agree to the format. You get at least some to agree, and it is shown to work. From there, others end up using it, and we now have something that works. I do thank you for using the word 'additional channel', as that is the best way to describe it. By the way, please send me some email. I would be interested in having you input into a Yahoo forum set up now to discuss this. I would like get you the link. Please email me at rich [at symbol] IAGOWorldTour.com or richardhutnik [At symbol] optonline.net , so I can get you the URL link. I would post the URL link here, but I want to make it be a bit private. Also, anyone else please email me, so I can get you the link. Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID Standards does not match any item.