Enter Your Reply

I generally like the idea.  I think the inventor shouldn't rate the game;
if they want to mention what they think of the game, it should go into the
page somewhere (in the introduction would be good).  I'm a little worried
about rating games when they are themed or experimental: for instance, my
only game is 4D, so probably not a good candidate for frequent play, but
(IMO of course) it is a very good setup as far as 4D games go.  Should it
get rated in the former sense or the latter?  Maybe the frequency of play
question will serve this purpose too, but maybe there should be a third
rating?  (So 'good game', 'interesting', and 'often played'?)