Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
gnohmon wrote on Mon, Jun 9, 2003 04:16 AM UTC:
I hadn't seen Doublechess, but it seems to me that Doublechess is not at
all like Doublewide, even though it uses the same size board. Doublewide
has the elegant setup of two normal setups side by side, so simple that I
guessed that it had probably been previously invented. Most important of
all, Doublewide has two Kings, and that's really the most interesting
part.

As for Millennium Chess, it seems to be 15x8 and its rules for the use of
two Kings are strange.

Doublewide is simply double. Mate one King the game is over. Fewest
possible rule changes.

The idea that the two Rooks together are too strong even though they are
opposed by two Rooks together is an odd idea, to say the least.
Cylindrical Chess remains popular even though it has the two Rooks
together.

You must understand also that Doublewide will lead directly to the idea
that 8x8x8 3D Chess should be played with 8 Kings, both to alleviate the
difficulty of checkmating the bare K in the late endgame and also to
shorten the average number of moves per game; and for this reason,
Doublewide is not only interesting in its own right, but it is also a
foundation for further development.

(Doublewide itself is a direct consequence of Twinkie Danger and
Chutes&Ladders, of course.)

The thing is, Doublewide is such a simple idea (I'm still sure that
eventually we'll find an exact precedent), but so interesting (the more I
thought about the game, the more I liked it).

Edit Form

Comment on the page Doublewide Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.