Ratings & Comments
This is David Paulowich writing in support of the standard rules for pawn promotion, which seem to be unpopular with some players and chess variant designers. If, for example, pawns could only be promoted to previously captured pieces, then many beautiful games would no longer be legal. My databases contain over 400 games with 4 Queens on the board, 2 White and 2 Black, including: Capablanca - Alekhine, 1927 (Thirteenth World Chess Championship Match, game 11) and Borsony - Koch, 1956 (Second World Correspondence Chess Championship). In 1936 Reinle checkmated Lange in this 'extra promotion' game: 1. e4 e5 2. f4 f5 3. exf5 e4 4. Qh5+ g6 5. fxg6 h6 6. g7+ Ke7 7. Qe5+ Kf7 8. gxh8=N#
Such games, with one player having nine pieces other than pawns, used to be rare (only ten were played between 1856 and 1963). In modern times the opening: 1. b4 e5 2. Bb2 Bxb4 3. f4 exf4 4. Bxg7 Qh4+ 5. g3 fxg3 6. Bg2 gxh2+ 7. Kf1 hxg1=Q+ 8. Kxg1 (from Kucharkowski - Walter, 1982) has been repeated in over 200 games. Incidentally, White is winning, by about 150 to 50.
Excelent and under-appreciated gem! In a few game of this variant, I found how the simplest change alters the game dramatically. For example this variant makes bishop no longer color bound, and nullifies the use of castling.
Equine flesh was still available on menus in places such as Ni^mes, Narbonne, or Carcassonne, as recently as a quarter of a century ago; and perhaps it still is. Given that bovines are now raised in heavily polluting factories and fed on a diet that consists of antibiotics, hormones, noxious chemicals, and nameless gobbets of unidentified (best not to know) flesh, don't you think it would be more salutory and more rational to devour an equine than a bovine? And if the horse talks, so much the better. One cannot subsist on ratatouille alone; at times, carnivory is necessary to sate the taste; so what if it's Bambi's mom, or Black Beauty? Jeeves was thought to have eaten gobs of fish, and therefore such a brain; but nowadays the FDA recommends (NY Times, a week or so ago) that you not eat too much fish because we have befouled the limitless depths of the inexhaustible oceans with our poisons. Given that chicken is a worse factory food than beef, one can eat neither fish nor foul.... Today, if you wish to eat meat, your best chance if survival lies in goat, rabbit (there is a reason why the furry rabbit foot is attached, you know), horse, venison, and the like. Your local ethnic butcher may be able to supply you. Those who scorn the equine feast merely reveal their ignorance of the sad state of affairs to which we have brought ourselves. Of course, there is always the escargot as an alternativ; or perhaps four and twenty blackbirds baked in a pie. But why not horse? O thou naysayer, bridle your anti-equine passions and mount a saddle of horse ribs on your table; and hope it does not give you the galloping trots.
I have attempted to incorporate everybody's comments into http://www.panix.com/~gnohmon/nemofull.html and I believe that it is now correct and can be regarded as the final version. Pay attention! there is a 'Credits' section at the end. If your name should be there but is not, please correct me so that I can apologize in private before final publication.
OK, I haven't yet played the game but I have some more questions about compulsion (Hey, I like to bend the rules to see if they broke, a good thing to do before final publication). The question revolves around pieces that are compelled to move, and after moving they are still compelled, this is legal (vg Alabaster Human on d3, Obsidian Ghast on d4. d3 is compelled, but can flee to c3 or c4 and it's still compelled. Then to the b-file to save itself. This is legal and I have no question about that). So the rule I derive here is that a compelled move does not need to remove compulsion. OK, Now add an Alabaster Ghast on b3 to the previous board (which stalemates the Human) and an Alabaster Go Away on e2 (compelled by the Obsidian Ghast). Alabaster can make his human go to c3 by screaming GO AWAY! this is recorded as a saving move because it goes further away of the Obsidian Ghast. It's not moving of it's own accord so it's legal that it approaches his own Ghast. the Human can now move to b5 fleeing both Ghasts and compulsion would be removed, and the Go Away has several flight squares (this term is hugely adequate here). I see this new scenario is also legal and reinforces the rule that a compelled move (or a saving move) does not need to remove compulsion. OK, with this in mind I present this new situation. Alabaster Go Away on b2 (this is a new board, the Ghasts are gone). Alabaster has a compelled piece on b3 which is Ichorous. b4 is also Ichorous. Screaming is a saving move? My logic says yes. Now remove the Ichor on the board, and make b3 a multiple-ocupation square. Screaming now sends both pieces on b3 to b4 which becomes multiple-ocupation. Is this a saving move? I know it sounds weird, but looking at the previous examples it should be! And now some lighter comments: I first found a little weird that the Go Away was the only piece who lost its Ability when petrified, but now I find it a nice balancing act, as the Go Away is the richest piece, you don't want it petrified. I don't know wether this was thought to happen or just turned out that way. Granted, Human loses his Ability to promote, but I consider this is not an innate Ability, just one that the Powers that Be grant brave humans who reach the end zone. Now it makes me wonder what happens if a Human moves to a Basilisk square in the last rank. Do the Powers that Be reward his journey and make him a Zombie or would They be very disapointed by this fumble entering the end zone and leave him a statue? (to keep this football analogy I've now noticed I started, it's only necessary that the ball [ie the Human] breaks the goal line plane [ie the line separating 7th and 8th rank] when in possession [ie alive, not petrified] for a touchdown [ie a Zombie] to be scored.) So football rules, say that it's a Zombie, but this is not football. Zombie or Statue? and if a Human is pushed onto an ichorous square in the last rank, is it an Alive Zombie (Book of Oxymorons, #427) or a Self-Destruction?
I also thought of a notation. I put it on a new comment because it's a totally different subject and the previous comment was getting long. This system will be easy to learn because it's algebraic notation. (Go Away's initial is A, since G is taken by the Ghast). a prefixed p means 'petrified'. pB is a petrified Basilisk and so on. A move that causes compulsion is marked +, and a stalemating move is ++; some explanation can come after that A move that causes some changes to a piece is explained after an =, and x means 'engulfs' (note that only Lx is legal). For a Zombie destroying something I'd use *, for example Z*d7. (This is the only new symbol). A Go Away that screams is recorded as moving to its own square (and possibly an = preceding the effects). The fool's mate you show in the document would be scored this way. 1. Bd3=pHc2,pHe2 ; Gb6 2. Be5=pHd7,pHf7? ; Gd4=pGd4++d2! 0-1 Note I used a semi-colon to separate Alabaster and Obsidian moves, because I think commas will be common in this game and it adds clarity. Any thoughts?
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.