💡📝Hans Aberg wrote on Fri, May 2, 2008 09:42 PM UTC:
H.G.Muller:
| Indeed, I plan to submit a paper to the ICGA Journal discussing the
| piece values and the empirical statistical method used to obtain them.
You might have a look at things like:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_information
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_information
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner's_dilemma
Your claims are similar to the idea that chess players under some circumstances get a Nash equilibrium. This might happen, say, if the players focus on only simple playing strategies where piece vales have an important role, and they are unable to switch to a different one. Note that the prisoner's dilemma leads to such an equilibrium when repeated, because players can punish for past defections. In chess, this might happen if chess players are unable to develop a more powerful playing theory, say due to the complexity. - Just an input, to give an idea of what reasoning one might expect to support claims of predictions.