Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

~~Earlier~~ ⇧Reverse Order⇩ ~~Later~~

Paramount Parafigures. An army where some pieces are triply-divergent. (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]

A. M. DeWitt wrote on Wed, Jan 24, 2024 08:25 PM UTC:

This is certainly an intriguing idea.

I think this page would benefit greatly from an Interactive Diagram.

Also, are there any other differences in the rules of the game? If so, you should put those in the Rules section. Otherwise, I'd say in the Rules section that the rules are the same as in Chess except where contradicted.

💡📝HaruN Y wrote on Fri, Jan 26, 2024 11:39 PM UTC in reply to A. M. DeWitt from Wed Jan 24 08:25 PM:Good ★★★★

files=8 ranks=8 promoZone=1 promoChoice=NBRQ graphicsDir=/graphics.dir/alfaeriePNG/ squareSize=50 graphicsType=png symmetry=none pawn:P:ifmnDfmWfceF:pawn:a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2,h2,,a7,b7,c7,d7,e7,f7,g7,h7 knight:N:N:knight:b1,g1 bishop:B:B:bishop:c1,f1 rook:R:R:rook:a1,h1 queen:Q:Q:queen:d1,,d8 R/B/N parafigure:ب:mRkcBkN:bishopinv:,,c8,f8 N/R/B parafigure:ن:mNkcRkB:knightinv:,,b8,g8 B/N/R parafigure:ر:mBkcNkR:rookinv:,,a8,h8 king:K:KisO2:king:e1,,e8

No other differences.

A. M. DeWitt wrote on Tue, Jan 30, 2024 09:53 PM UTC in reply to HaruN Y from Fri Jan 26 11:39 PM:

I meant an Interactive Diagram in the Setup section.

I guess now that I think about it, this is good enough for approval, considering that it is an army for CWDA rather than a standalone game.