Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier ⇧Reverse Order⇩ Later
3 Man Chess: Review. Missing description[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
SHAIFUL wrote on Wed, Nov 20, 2002 09:11 AM EST:Poor ★
I AM NOT GOOD AT THIS

Charles Gilman wrote on Fri, Mar 5, 2004 02:10 AM EST:
Shaiful seems have misunderstood the 'rating' section. It is supposed to be what the person commenting thinks of the page and/or the game or piece that it describes, not their own proficiency at the game. That is why it is meaningful to average them to an 'overall rating'.

Roger Crow wrote on Wed, Dec 28, 2005 10:34 PM EST:Good ★★★★
I, for one, happen to own a similar 3-man chess variant similar to this, and I think that this is an interesting variant. Well done.

Anonymous wrote on Tue, Mar 14, 2006 11:52 PM EST:
Cool-looking set. Though trying to visualize diagonal moves through the center makes me kind of dizzy.

4 comments displayed

Earlier ⇧Reverse Order⇩ Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.