Check out Janggi (Korean Chess), our featured variant for December, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Mike Nelson wrote on Wed, Aug 7, 2002 12:40 AM UTC:
I've had the pleasure of playtesting our creation over the weekend. 
Michael Howe's prediction is correct: the subtle positional play is
reminiscent of Shatranj.  But the the rapid developement provides many
opportunities for quick wins.  A bit like the slash-bang feel of Xiangqi.

Letting Zillions play itself at a fairly inteligent setting, two types of
results tended to occur: a subtle positional game of 60-90 moves, or an
opening error folowed by a breakthrough win in 20-30.

Typically, at the end of move 10, 14 of the pawns are on the original
squares. But in the middlegame, the pawns really come into their own--as
the rest of the army is weaker, the pawn is more powerful.

Zillions thinks the pieces are roughly 2/3 of the value of their FIDE
counterparts and I agree.  It also thinks the Knight is more valuable than
the Bishop, but not by a lot.

I think that the Separate Realms army might be quite interesting in
variants such as Chessgi, Progressive, etc.

I would also be interested in hearing anyone's ideas about different
armies in this strength range.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Separate Realms

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.