Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
William Overington wrote on Sat, Sep 14, 2002 04:28 PM UTC:
I notice in the page for the Griffon the statement that the Griffon has
asymmetrical-retreat properties.

This is interesting.

I wonder if it might be a nice idea to devise a chess variant where all of
the pieces have asymmetrical-retreat properties.

Are there any other pieces which have asymmetrical-retreat properties or
would some need to be devised in order to produce such a game?

There could be a piece which is related to a conventional bishop in much
the same manner as a griffon is related to a conventional rook, in that
for such a piece there could be a move of one square orthogonally followed
by a diagonal move away from the original position for zero or more empty
squares, together with the possibility of capturing from a final occupied
square of the move.  This piece would always move to a square of the
opposite colour.

It would seem that in order to have asymmetrical-retreat properties that a
piece could not be simply a leaper.

There could be pieces where one screen piece in the route of movement is a
necessity.  One such could perhaps be a piece that has movement which
changes from orthogonal to diagonal at the screen piece.

Any ideas for existing or new pieces which would be suitable for such a
game please?

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.