Check out Janggi (Korean Chess), our featured variant for December, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Larry Smith wrote on Fri, Jun 9, 2006 07:20 PM EDT:
Even if the game generates a value, using this formula, which is close to
or even exactly like that of the Mad Queen variant, it would not
necessarily mean that the game is in any way similar.

The only thing that this formula would note is a ratio between the piece
power/density and field size. This value is really of little use without
further considerations.

I once advocated that the difference in the piece-types, or the potential
exchange ratios, might have an influence in the game. A game which is
populated with pieces of similar value offer little chance for advantage
during play. While a game with a large variety of piece-types would offer
a greater opportunity for advantage during play.

Even this would not be the only consideration when evaluating a game.

There was a old thread which covered this particular subject. Does anyone
know its title and how to access it?

Never mind, I found it:

http://www.chessvariants.org/index/listcomments.php?limitby=75&subjectid=Game+Design

Edit Form

Comment on the page Optimum design of a Chess variant

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.