Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Joe Joyce wrote on Sun, Jun 24, 2007 02:32 AM UTC:
We seem to have gotten a wide range of responses here, from being as
symmetric as possible to de-emphasizing symmetry and looking at other
options to balance the sides. I actually like all the answers given here,
and use or will use each in designs. 
Derek - I read your paper [again] before replying here. I find that a very high level of symmetry does allow for a fair game, though I have designed
most of my games without '4-axes' symmetry [both E-W & N-S]. Chieftain Chess, which I think is my most fair design, uses 4-axes symmetry, and
breaks rather completely with traditional chess in having no pawns or
other uni-directional pieces, multi-move turns [up to 4 pieces per side
per turn], all shortrange pieces [1, 2, or 3 squares maximum], a 'large'
[12x16] board, no king but rather 4 chieftains, and leadership rules. I'd
considered having white start the game by making only 2 moves, and thus
balancing the game, as each side, when it's finished its turn, has moved
2 more pieces than the opponent, but I believe the other design features
make this superfluous, to the extent I did not wish to add another unique
rule to the game. I believe this is a perfectly fair game for both sides
as is, because of the initial placement/separation of the sides, the short range of piece movement, and the ability of black to move backward away
from contact and into a stronger defensive position. Leadership rules and
the unique nature of the inclusive compound pieces add to the
effectiveness of the placement, range, and [backward] mobility of the
pieces. And while it may not be perfect, it can be played beginning to end with constant E-W symmetry at the beginning and end of each half-turn [each player's move]. I invite your comments on this game.

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.