Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
George Duke wrote on Thu, Jun 14, 2012 09:49 PM UTC:

Right probably Grande Acedrez Lion is mis-interpreted, where some old schools describe distances including the starting square. Okay, Gilman defines Beaver as Bison plus Trilby in M&B06. Trilby is bi-compound of the Tripper (3,3) and Trebouchet(0,3) renaming the Jeliss and problemist Threeleaper, both Tripper and Trebuchet in M&B06. If Gilman has used any of those, they would be Tripper and Trebuchet, not Trilby and Beaver. He often deliberately implements a new-found or -named fundamental, but his indexes do not go from piece-type to cv anywhere reliably yet. Count on his having put all the oblique leapers into cvs, but where are Tripper and Trebouchet? Lavieri Grand Bishop of Altair leaps three diagonally as a bi-compound having to slide to the other Bishop squares. Heddon's Microorganism's Paramecium is Tripper but as just one part of the tri-compound it is. Heddon's IO's SuperComputer is Trebuchet but as just one part ot that tri-compound. Almost certainly Beaver and Trilby are not done yet formally in any cv. There would be several other piece-types that can leap to (0,3) or to (3,3). For example, Ramayana Buddha who leaps to all Rook destinations, and Ramayana Rakshasa who leaps to all the Bishop arrival squares. Jeremy Good's cv hre has both Archabbott and Squirrel as tri-compounds, the loophole for this larger topic.

(test)


Edit Form

Comment on the page Archabbott Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.