Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Joe Joyce wrote on Thu, Aug 9, 2012 10:36 PM UTC:
George, thanks for the reference. That's where I took my numbers from.
I'd run across it when I was searching for the answer, and that's the
best I did in that search. I was quite surprised to see nothing there,
other than it might be this or it might be that, and everybody likes tempo.
But given the specific rules of chess, with move order and general
structure built in, the thing that most gives white that 30% win-lose
advantage is mobility primarily, as far as I can tell. No one, anyhow, has
shot down the contrafactual argument. If you accept the premises, the
result seems to follow inexorably. 

Derek, you may be right with that chain of "if A, then B; if B, then C, if
C...", but like the Drake equation, it is expandable, and at each stop
along the way [a, b, c... etc] you lose some of what you're looking for. I
think you present too long a chain of events, giving too many opportunities
to go wrong. I like short, sharp and simple here. Occam's Razor. Mobility,
with or without board size and pawn reversibility, seemingly can be tested
by using pieces that are all short range. Check the stats of great
Shatranj, where all the pieces move only one or two squares [but all jump],
and run FIDE-type games with B2, R2, and Q2, and/or B3, R3, and Q3
repalcing the infinite sliders, and see what happens to the stats. Even HG
Muller's piece value estimation method, properly carried out, will give an
indication, because it does show white with a 53-47 ad.

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.