Check out Janggi (Korean Chess), our featured variant for December, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Kevin Pacey wrote on Wed, Apr 12, 2017 03:43 AM UTC:

I was mainly going by parts of the commentary on your Eurasian Chess page, Fergus, i.e. about the relative values of the various pieces (given at one point in decreasing order of value, though excluding any numerical values) . This was based on the various listed bare means of delivering basic Eurasian Chess checkmates. Correctly or not, I tried to take these listed bare means heavily into account myself when putting a N as slightly ahead a B (in numerical terms, in my case).

By way of comparison purposes, for my own 10x10 Sac Chess variant, I estimated a B at 3.5 and the N at 3, i.e. the reverse of what I've estimated their worth at in Eurasian Chess, which is in line with the premise your question (greater B mobility on a 10x10 board should favour it on average) as far as that game goes. However, Sac Chess is played with Ks that are like chess Ks (unlike in Eurasian Chess), so even for an average case Sac Chess endgame, I'd suppose the relative values of B and N would not be in any way affected. It may seem I'm going into contorsions a little to justify these values, but fwiw it seems to me one often has to use somewhat convoluted thinking to come up with estimates of the relative values of fairy chess pieces, unless one trusts fully in computer studies (in my case, I'd prefer to at least have a program used for a study that has a strong chess rating, if nothing else).

Note that even for Eurasian Chess I thought a B should be worth at least 3 pawns, but neither it nor a N should be worth 4 pawns. I wasn't going to have a Cannon worth 4.5 pawns (I think it was valued this in a Chinese Chess book I've seen, for what that's worth, though that book put R=9 to give context).

Note that a drawback of having V=2 is that three Vs=6 (greater than a R) yet any colour combination of these would never suffice to mate a lone K, not even by a helpmate.

I must point out that there's a slight discrepency between my Sac Chess value Q=10 and my Eurasian Chess value Q=9.5 (with the formula Q=R+B+P used for both games), given that the Eurasian Chess value for the Q really ought to be ten pawns too, in my view, but since in general reality cannot be perfect in every way, I wasn't going to quibble over 1/2 a P in value for such a high value piece as a Q (noting, though, that 2Rs=Q+P is a material equivalency formula that perhaps ought to still be valid in practice on average, in the event that that material balance happens in either game).

P.S.: Partly to avoid the slight discrepancy mentioned in the previous paragraph, here's my latest (possibly more accurate) set of relative values for the Eurasian Chess pieces, albeit with more (and uglier) fractional values included: P=1; V=1.75; B=3.5; N=3.75; C=3.75 (but just 2.75 in an endgame); R=5.5; Q=10 and K has fighting value=5. This set of values has the added point that 3Vs are now worth less than a R, though at the moment I'm feeling slightly uncomfortable with having such a relatively low value for a V, since for one thing it's possible 2V+K, or perhaps even V+K, can routinely hold a draw against B+P+K with ease (e.g. perhaps just by parking a V, if of the opposite colour of the B, on a square on its own side of the board in front of the P, and then only moving the defending K from then on). Also, is a N really worth more than 2V on average? Granted, this piece plus a V mate a lone K, unlike 3V...


Edit Form

Comment on the page Eurasian Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.