Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Sun, Jun 4, 2023 03:57 PM EDT:

It is unclear to me what "being in check" means if you have two royal pieces that have to be captured both, as these could never be captured in the same move. Normally "check" means you are one move away from losing. But in variants with extinction royalty you can ignore attacks on the royals when you have more than one. So if the Prince gets attacked, must this be resolved, or can you ignore that? And if the King gets attacked while you still have a Prince? What does it mean that "both are checkmated"? Pieces can be checked, but checkmate or stalemate are properties of the entire position. It could be that both Prince and King are attacked, neither of these can move to a safe square, and the attackers cannot be blocked. But that the Prince can capture the protected attacker of the King. This loses you the Prince, but resolves the check on King.

I see no justification for using piece symbols that normally designate other pieces. Especially if these symbols are indicative for the move, such as the Crowned Bishop. Why intentionally sow confusion in a variant that has so many pieces already?


Edit Form

Comment on the page Vanguard Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.