Check out Janggi (Korean Chess), our featured variant for December, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
George Duke wrote on Sat, Mar 20, 2004 05:05 PM UTC:
Roberto: In a way this topic starts with Robert Abbott's 1980's article
'What's Wrong with Ultima.'  Eventually, tone of CVP becomes, what is
right with Rococo?--Ultima offshoot.  Now theme is: what is right and what
is wrong with Fugue?   I consider myself Rococo playing expert from
present-Courier games, nothing wrong with Rococo as it is.  Based on
knowledge 2000 Encyclopedia CV games and more or less 2000 CVP games 
and 200 games patents more or less, I see at least one suspect feature in
Fugue, high piece-type density, not having played it.  Maybe standards or
principles, Depth, Clarity, Piece-type Density, help evaluate games,
because there is this prospect (simply using Fugue as available example):
Vary the Archer-Bowman ten ways (ranges), vary the Shield ten ways
(different piece combinations not shielded etc.), vary the Pawns ten ways
(make one or two Pawns unique piece, for ten piece types altogether, etc.).
 Those options alone make 10x10x10 = 1000 new games, 1000 more sets of
rules, more or less.  A better way: a priori evaluative criteria.
As far as subjectivity in Arts, Paracelsus says, 'Resolute imagination is
the beginning of all magical operations.  Because men do not perfectly
believe and imagine, the result is that Arts are uncertain when they might
be wholly certain.'

Edit Form

Comment on the page Fugue

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.