Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Sat, Jan 27 07:07 AM UTC in reply to Kevin Pacey from 01:08 AM:

Well, even though the values quoted for Omega Chess seem nothing but guesses by a single person, there is no real surprise there: sliders gain in value compared to leapers on deeper boards, because the latter need more moves to make themselves useful. On wider boards it is mainly the value of the Bishop that goes up compared to that of the Rook, because the Bishop will attack the enemy camp in two spots with its forward moves on a larger fraction of the board, rather than one of its moves going to waste by hitting the edge. A Rook doesn't benefit much from a wider board; the chances rhat it will attack anything with its sideway moves hardly changes there.

Note that the value of slow pieces in practice is very much dependent on their location, on deep boards, much nore than with 8 ranks, where a Knight can attack enemy Pawns already after a single move, and you take it for granted that this move will be made, rather than keeping it undeveloped for the entire game. From Xiangqi it is well known that Horses are much more valuable when the approac the enemy Palace, and central (promoted) Pawns even gain about 50% in moving from 6th rank to 9th. In Shogi the board is not as deep, but the pieces are slower, and Gold Generals far from the Kings are basically worth nothing at all. So I doubt that the Omega value estimate would be anywhere close for a Champion that is on 8th or 9th rank inside the enemy camp.


Edit Form

Comment on the page Parity Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.