Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Single Comment

[Subject Thread] [Add Response]
George Duke wrote on Mon, Feb 8, 2010 07:38 PM UTC:
Since there will only be one new CV inserted to rankings every couple weeks in the project  for now, Winther's question on recapitulation is relevant, ''What are the criteria for this evaluation?''
First are links back to fall 2008 on the successive threads:
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/listcomments.php?subjectid=NextChess.
The one above has 118 comments, and only 25 (the maximum the system allows)appear, so I am re-reading them to summarize and/or further link back to some of the earlier isolated 93 comments.
Others followed in order:
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/listcomments.php?subjectid=NextChess2,
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/listcomments.php?subjectid=NextChess3,
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/listcomments.php?subjectid=NextChess4,
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/listcomments.php?subjectid=NextChess5,
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/listcomments.php?subjectid=NextChess6,
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/listcomments.php?subjectid=NextChess7.
Since we have the end-part done correctly, the rankings 1 to 23 so far, I want to be sure the rationale and the criteria get re-stated without contradiction.