May 2017 (and after) will be The month of the debate : Human-chimp=BRAIN vs A.I.
Since game 6 of the Deeper-blue-Kasparov re-match, played in NYC on May 11, 1997., what a run :
currently, the most basic-connected fridge has the hability to beat man !
Already, Google A.I-DEEPMIND seems developing very bad caracter in process of loosing, (in between machines-contests), tending to make « extremely agressive » choices...
But, for pioneering enthusiasts, her are some ideas for « Refuznik’s » cogitations...
Above all we must have in mind that in the sequences TACTICAL > OPERATIONAL > STRATEGIC (narrowest to largest), the game of Chess1.0 only reached the second, but never the third, if not only by langage mis-abuse…
An example among others, with our chesstrend.com productions (not yet commercial project, therefore free of speech in these C.V. amateur Pages, I beg...thank’s )
The (playable !) STRATEQxCHESS2.0 has a resolution probably superior to the power 500, that no Cyber could actually beat in the trial MAN=STRATEGIST vs CYBORG=HyperTACTICIAN only.
Of course derivates of Chess are the best skills to prove that we will meet an « intelligence » front of us one or other decade… Hour eyes have the « holo-architect » vision, and our mind is able to anticipate survival strategies, in projecting the future… THAT, can’t yet the Machine, reloading the challenge !
Let us share some interesting Ref’s from scattered autors:
§ INFINITE CHESS by Joel D. Hamkins, a math/logic hipster.
DEEPER_GLUE vs WORLD CHAMP TODAY: 20Y - 2 Weeks…
May 2017 (and after) will be The month of the debate : Human-chimp=BRAIN vs A.I.
Since game 6 of the Deeper-blue-Kasparov re-match, played in NYC on May 11, 1997., what a run :
currently, the most basic-connected fridge has the hability to beat man !
Already, Google A.I-DEEPMIND seems developing very bad caracter in process of loosing, (in between machines-contests), tending to make « extremely agressive » choices...
But, for pioneering enthusiasts, her are some ideas for « Refuznik’s » cogitations...
Above all we must have in mind that in the sequences TACTICAL > OPERATIONAL > STRATEGIC (narrowest to largest), the game of Chess1.0 only reached the second, but never the third, if not only by langage mis-abuse…
An example among others, with our chesstrend.com productions (not yet commercial project, therefore free of speech in these C.V. amateur Pages, I beg...thank’s )
The (playable !) STRATEQxCHESS2.0 has a resolution probably superior to the power 500, that no Cyber could actually beat in the trial MAN=STRATEGIST vs CYBORG=HyperTACTICIAN only.
Of course derivates of Chess are the best skills to prove that we will meet an « intelligence » front of us one or other decade… Hour eyes have the « holo-architect » vision, and our mind is able to anticipate survival strategies, in projecting the future… THAT, can’t yet the Machine, reloading the challenge !
Let us share some interesting Ref’s from scattered autors:
§ INFINITE CHESS by Joel D. Hamkins, a math/logic hipster.
http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/playing-infinite-chess/
§ Axiom system developer- Greg Schmidt « The future evolution of chess variants »
http://splay.webstarts.com/axiomcontestgames.html
§ The Future of Post-Human Chess: A Preface to a New Theory of Tactics an Strategy by Peter Baofu.
A wonderfull title for an undrinkable book {;°ààà}
http://www.cisp-publishing.com/acatalog/info_83.htlm
« TACTICS WITHOUT STRATEGY IS NOISE BEFORE DEFEAT » said Lao Tzu very long time ago :
In this reasoning way, the « BOLSHOYA- YKRA », the Great-Extended-Game, is certainly coming, which will have the hability to swallow « Deep-Glue » ...