Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Single Comment

Ideal Values and Practical Values (part 3). More on the value of Chess pieces.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
gnohmon wrote on Fri, Jul 18, 2003 04:03 AM UTC:
I think of the magic number as arbitrary because I was there...

In the early 1980s, I wrote a computer program to do the value calc for a
large range of magic numbers (0.50, 0.51, and so on). Then I printed out
the results and picked the value that I liked best. This seemed very
arbitrary to me; yes, given the idea of average crowded-board mobility,
some magic constant is needed; and yes, the idea of crowded-board mobility
has a strong feel of Truth to it, which somewhat justifies picking it in
such a crude and self-predictive way.

But because I was there I never have felt strong faith in the magic
number!