H. G. Muller wrote on Sun, Apr 26, 2020 02:28 PM UTC:
Well, perhaps I am exceptionally stupid then, because I did not understand it. Criticism is good; it can lead to improvement of the quality of the website. We should do it as much as possible. Authors should not be blind to imperfections in their work, and the normal response would be to repair the defects, rather than complaining about someone noticing them.
What make you think that we would only scrutinize your articles? The article attracted attention because it was newly posted. Not because it was you that posted it. As you can see my freshly posted article about Tengu Dai Shogi gets a lot of criticism.
Peer review works! It is a good way to guarantee quality.
Well, perhaps I am exceptionally stupid then, because I did not understand it. Criticism is good; it can lead to improvement of the quality of the website. We should do it as much as possible. Authors should not be blind to imperfections in their work, and the normal response would be to repair the defects, rather than complaining about someone noticing them.
What make you think that we would only scrutinize your articles? The article attracted attention because it was newly posted. Not because it was you that posted it. As you can see my freshly posted article about Tengu Dai Shogi gets a lot of criticism.
Peer review works! It is a good way to guarantee quality.