Thinking about the FAH (which I call Siege Elephant in my games) and the champion there is also the WL (That I call Mamluk) and the FL (the wizard). So you may have a variation on the game where the WAD and FL are replaced by FAH and WL.
See now why I prefer to make variations on the same theme? Or it could be just me being weird, I guess.
Actually I do not now how this goes with your other pieces. But if you replace the FA with WD it is probably the same.
Also, the craziness could go on, you know?
And another thing. Have you considered bent riders that bend after more then 1 move: the R2 then bishop or the B2 then rook? They probably work well in such variants.
Thinking about the FAH (which I call Siege Elephant in my games) and the champion there is also the WL (That I call Mamluk) and the FL (the wizard). So you may have a variation on the game where the WAD and FL are replaced by FAH and WL.
See now why I prefer to make variations on the same theme? Or it could be just me being weird, I guess.
Actually I do not now how this goes with your other pieces. But if you replace the FA with WD it is probably the same.
Also, the craziness could go on, you know?
And another thing. Have you considered bent riders that bend after more then 1 move: the R2 then bishop or the B2 then rook? They probably work well in such variants.