@HG: yes I was convinced that you hadn't finished. :=)
And about the size, of course, I was saying that your idea/principle is good and that it might be ALSO interesting at very large games. It is good to test it first on a reasonable size.
I will test it. I wonder what's happen in the end game if the losing side pushes his/her K in the opponent's zone where the attacking pieces have less power. Doesn't that make the mate more difficult to achieve?
@HG: yes I was convinced that you hadn't finished. :=) And about the size, of course, I was saying that your idea/principle is good and that it might be ALSO interesting at very large games. It is good to test it first on a reasonable size.
I will test it. I wonder what's happen in the end game if the losing side pushes his/her K in the opponent's zone where the attacking pieces have less power. Doesn't that make the mate more difficult to achieve?