you'd (apparently) lean toward using ß for Sexton, while I'd use it for Switchback
We're technically not contradicting each other; I was using capital ⟨ẞ⟩, as is usual for atoms, whereas Switchback, whilst really something that XBetza would tend to spell out explicitly, is definitely small ⟨ß⟩ material
That depends; the Windows-1252 character set that I'm suggesting to use as the basis (because even a system without Unicode installed should have at least that much) only has ß. That, I believe is the lower-case letter -- which would rather spoil my use.
By the way, the full XBetza for the Switchback would be afq(afzafq)K(afqafz)K, which I think would be quite rarely used and only needed to be "atomized" for a rifle capture, bent slider, or something similarly strange. So not having it wouldn't necessarily be a big loss, and one of the other letters in the set (like maybe Ï? Or Ş, if all of Unicode is opened up) could still work if I really want it.
That depends; the Windows-1252 character set that I'm suggesting to use as the basis (because even a system without Unicode installed should have at least that much) only has ß. That, I believe is the lower-case letter -- which would rather spoil my use.
By the way, the full XBetza for the Switchback would be afq(afzafq)K(afqafz)K, which I think would be quite rarely used and only needed to be "atomized" for a rifle capture, bent slider, or something similarly strange. So not having it wouldn't necessarily be a big loss, and one of the other letters in the set (like maybe Ï? Or Ş, if all of Unicode is opened up) could still work if I really want it.