Roberto Lavieri wrote on Mon, Oct 4, 2004 12:12 PM UTC:Good ★★★★
Comment on the game: ChessV vs. Zillions, 30 sec. per player per move.
Opening was weakly played by both programs, and you can observe the that
the Pawn movements are not the best in both. The game play was more
tactical than positional, the pair King-Coordinator is not used in the
best way, and Immobilizer potential-and-risks is not well appreciated. But
Chess V 'understood' better the game philosophy, and the end was played
relatively good by Chess V, although with clear deficiences by Zillions.
Very interesting test game!.