Comments by CryInto
This game was twice deleted, but now is done and ready!
Since this comment is for a page that has not been published yet, you must be signed in to read it.
Since this comment is for a page that has not been published yet, you must be signed in to read it.
Agreed, and for more than just this! :) But still, the [K?SS] makes me want to rock and roll all nite... and party every day... ;)
My Torch, indeed;)
Since this comment is for a page that has not been published yet, you must be signed in to read it.
And on Lichess also with real Stockfish. I disgust if Chess.com engine is Stockfish, though.
Bracket notation there sucks up, so thank you for the 8x8’s notation. Second
- should include both steps, but camel-wise and then ibis-like
- current is wrong because is (6,9) instead of (3,9)
thx for effort anyway;)
When three Frogs became Tsarevnas and pass away, player has to checkmate with 2 Frogs which’s amusing. That’s the main idea of that rule.
Read the page properly. Parabola doesn’t leap, step must free to let go farther
Ну они не поняли, бывает. Их цель – сделать каждый аспект игры понятным. Вы можете сделать самое лучшее – уточнить это прямо в тексте страницы, что «шах после Вашего хода – победа, после чужого – наоборот». Для нас это понятно, для них нет) а в целом отлично)
Piece images’ rotation doesn’t work.
It turns the >, < and _ into %3C or sth like it.
Edited, please watch what’s done)
Bruh can you just add No-Castling as a version of Chess on its existing page?
You plan to do a weekend pair? Catch a pair which I made some time ago but did not know how to realize it.
Bumper (BmpR) aka Trick Biker and Repmub (RpmB) aka Stunt Master. Correlate with my Modern Republican Chess’ pieces, but themselves aren’t.
UPD: new name for Stewardess — Bicyclist (rotary counterpart for Motorcyclist)?
Тогда неплохо переключить с приватки (доступ только авторам и редакторам) на суд членов сайта (Страница > Править метаданные > Доступ, приватный или всеобщий для CVP)
Just a thought, but it would probably work better to either:
Have all pieces on the same color Have two Kings, one for each color, and only require one of them to be checkmated to win. This is since only half the army can reach the enemy King in the current version, and would be quite drawish if that half got depleted.
The page works quite well in presentation though.
Added second thought as a variation.
https://playstrategy.org/variant/noCastling
PlayStrategy supports it as a separate variant.
This page is ready for your review, please look at it.
Sounds good, playable at least at the first glance.
I don't get the point with "Хрен редьки не слаще" even with a translator.
Russian proverb: one trouble is not better than another.
Edited, closed all your checkboxes)
Just to illustrate an Alfil is a Bishop in Spanish, a Cavalier a Knight in French. The Queen in Russian is a Boat and the Bishop is an Elephant. The Bishop is a Fool in French.
Incorrect, Queen is Ferz while Rook is a Boat. Хрен редьки не слаще, to be said)
The problem of names of the piece, which is already an issue in English, may become a problem with other languages. <…> Of course, things are getting even weirder with other names of characters and animals. If I had to translate Bigorra with its more than 30 different pieces, I may come to some difficulties.
I’m creative, so I’ll find the right way)
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.
So simple? whoah!…)))))