Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

LatestLater Reverse Order EarlierEarliest
The FIDE Laws Of Chess. The official rules of Chess from the World Chess Federation.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Larry Smith wrote on Sat, Jun 18, 2005 03:18 AM UTC:
The short answer, Mike, is NO! You cannot make a move which leaves your King in check.

Mike wrote on Fri, Jun 17, 2005 09:43 PM UTC:
Question; If player one is placed into check, and has possible moves to escape mate, CAN PLAYER ONE LEAVE HIS KING IN CHECK IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO MATE PLAYER TWO'S KING IN ONE MOVE?

Gary Gifford wrote on Mon, May 16, 2005 09:11 PM UTC:
Tony is correct in that to approximated FIDE rules, when an illegal move is made in Game Courier that piece should be considered as 'touched' and would have to be moved, if it could make a legal move. A Game Courier that does not allow illegal moves is actually more kind than is FIDE. For example, in one of my face-to-face over-the-board games I placed a player's King in 'Check.' I announced check (but in official USCF tournament games such an announcement is not required and often not made). My opponent did not hear me and he then moved his Queen (but left his King in check.) Under the 'touch rule' he still had to move his Queen, if possible. So in this case he had to block the check with his Queen... and he lost his Queen as a result. A very harsh payment.

Tony Quintanilla wrote on Mon, May 16, 2005 05:08 PM UTC:
Gary: Here's an odd question, related to Game Courier. Obviously, in FIDE Chess, few make illegal moves, unless it's a gross oversight. But, with Chess variants, illegal moves are not uncommon, say in Game Courier presets that are not rules enforced. Typically, illegal moves are just done over again. By tournament rules, though, the corrected move should be of the same piece, if possible, should it not? If one takes the initial move as equivalent to touching the piece? This possible confusion is a good argument for rules enforced presets in tournaments.

Gary Gifford wrote on Mon, May 16, 2005 03:18 PM UTC:
'When a player lets go of his piece but doesn't hit the clock can he take the move back?' The answer is 'No.' Also, if you touch a piece (that is yours) you must move it [if the move is legal] and if you touch your opponent's piece you likewise must capture it [if legal]. An exception is if you say 'Adjust' or say the French equivalent word. When the clock has not been hit, the move is still valid. Unfortunately the time loss is quite real and there is no obligation to point out that a person's clock is running.

eric wrote on Sat, May 14, 2005 11:21 PM UTC:Good ★★★★
When a player lets go of his piece but doesn't hit the clock can he take the move back?

Doug Chatham wrote on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 05:16 PM UTC:
No. See the answer to 'Can kings stand near each other?' in the Chess FAQ page at <a href='http://www.chessvariants.org/d.chess/faq.html'>http://www.chessvariants.org/d.chess/faq.html</a>

Puneet wrote on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 03:43 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Great question....not onle this...there occur many situations where a king placed in the 'killing' range of the other king can cause a checkmate. Are those moves allowed.

jhcsup wrote on Sat, Apr 9, 2005 12:56 PM UTC:Good ★★★★
What do you do when all you have is pawns and your king when they have
everything but a knight and 3 pawns?

Larry Smith wrote on Thu, Feb 24, 2005 09:57 PM UTC:
Well, Tim, you get to watch your Queen die again. ;-)

tim wrote on Thu, Feb 24, 2005 08:03 PM UTC:
what do you do when you get your pawn to the other side get back your queen but you queen gets put in a position to be killed. What do you do??

Anonymous wrote on Wed, Feb 23, 2005 09:57 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Very good! Once the pawn goes to the other side of the board, you have to promote it to any other piece you want besides king and pawn. People always promote it to another queen because of its flexibility and power.

Anonymous wrote on Sat, Jan 8, 2005 12:55 PM UTC:
What would you do when the pawn goes to the other side of the board?
replace it with the queen?

sannidhi wrote on Thu, Dec 30, 2004 06:45 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
informative.

Anonymous wrote on Thu, Dec 30, 2004 06:04 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★

Pam wrote on Tue, Dec 7, 2004 04:23 PM UTC:
I am having a chess tournament (of sorts) for 3rd thru 6th grade at school. I have 18 kids involved so far and I have used your site as a guide to help them learn the game. Do you have any suggestions on what rules to use or leave out until they better understand the game?

Justin wrote on Fri, Nov 19, 2004 12:37 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Really informative

Peter Leyva wrote on Sun, Jun 6, 2004 10:18 PM UTC:
Thx Mike, 
I'm giving out bad advice. My appologies for the inconvience of wrong
instructions on the pawn play. 
Pete

Michael Nelson wrote on Sun, Jun 6, 2004 02:31 PM UTC:
A pawn can make a normal diagonal capture on its first move but it can't capture en passant on its first move -- this is not a legal restriction, but due to the fact that a pawn on its strating square is not in the correct position to make an ep capture.

Peter Leyva wrote on Sat, Jun 5, 2004 06:45 AM UTC:
Also, a pawn can capture by rule of enpassant on its' first move.

Matthew Paul wrote on Fri, Jun 4, 2004 09:57 PM UTC:
In response to firelightdown's question, a pawn can capture on it's first move by moving one square diagonally like normal.

firelightdown@yahoo. wrote on Fri, Jun 4, 2004 09:00 PM UTC:
Okay straight to the point - Concerning a pawn, on its first move from the starting position, can it 'take' another piece? I always thought you could.

Miguel Espinoza wrote on Thu, May 27, 2004 04:15 AM UTC:
What happens if a player leaves the room to his chamber???, for example
when Kasparov went to his room in the last Linares tournament, without
telling the referee.
please answer to purefan@yahoo.com
thanks

John Lawson wrote on Mon, May 17, 2004 09:50 PM UTC:
You cannot leave your King in check. This is covered in Article 9. Opponent 2 has commited an illegal move by failing to remove the check on his/her King. The move should be retracted and replayed.

mark wrote on Mon, May 17, 2004 09:35 PM UTC:
OK, newbies here -

Opponent one moves a piece putting opponent 2's king in check.

However, opponent 2 does not remove the check on his next turn, but puts
opponent 1's king in checkmate.

Is this a win for opp 2 or did he commit an illegal move by leaving his
king in check?

Please help guys, I feel marital disharmony is imminent!

25 comments displayed

LatestLater Reverse Order EarlierEarliest

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.