Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
George Duke wrote
Provisionally, I think Betza stayed on 64 squares, avoided 80 or 81 or 100, and 90, because to his satisfaction he had found the next chess, or he decided to act that way consistently for the rest of us
The former idea has some plausibility, given his opinion, as expressed in the comment you linked to, that CWDA may be the next Chess. But I think it would have more plausibility if he didn't create so many other variants. The explanation I find most plausible is, following Occam's razor, that he made variants mainly for the equipment he had available for playing them, which was a regular Chess set. Back when Betza made most of his variants, there weren't yet any computer programs (such as Zillions-of-Games) or websites (such as Game Courier) that would easily let you play almost any CV you could think of. In his day, CVs were played mainly by mail. In this interview, Betza mentions that he was in NOST, which was an organization devoted to postal play of CVs. When someone got moves by mail, it probably helped to be able to set up the current position of the game on a Chess board. Since most people who played by mail were likely to have Chess sets and less likely to have other CV equipment, this would limit most postal play to 8x8 boards. As to why he didn't create Xiangqi or Shogi variants, part of the explanation is given in the same interview I linked to. He didn't have much chance to play Shogi.
This thread has only five comments for anything Betza said. Betza uses ''gnohmon'' without identification, and probably those all belong to Betza. I started this and have not gone through most ''gnohmon'' yet from 2000-2003. Provisionally, I think Betza stayed on 64 squares, avoided 80 or 81 or 100, and 90, because to his satisfaction he had found the next chess, or he decided to act that way consistently for the rest of us: http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=614. More Betza thoughts are in articles than are in comments, and they could belong linked this thread too. Being 80 squares, Outrigger(2002) is his only regular cv of those above sizes. Does Betza ever use Xiangqi or Shogi piece-types on 64 squares? Affirmative. In fact, many of the types -- but he never uses Cannon! -- and they need re-locating for this context. One example is Shogi promoted Bishop, Dragon Horse, found in Betza's Augmented Chess as the same (Bishop + Wazir). Betza implementations from Xiangqi and Shogi never rise to level of ''variant of xiangqi/shogi'' as that has come to be understood by the usa/british crowd of re-workers in that art medium. In historical background, Betza just stopped at around 150 cvs mid-2003. Incidentally, around that same number 150 cvs five years later, Gilman said he would start cutting back output, in consideration of repetitiveness, but 'Gilmans' are nearing 250 now. It may also be interesting here to explore comparison of Betza and Boyer and Betza and Parton. This is legitimate topic thread for ''anything Betza.''
In one of the posts you linked to, Betza recommends acquiring knowledge of Xiangqi and Shogi, which I agree with. In the other, he writes about Go, which is a strategy board game but not a Chess variant. Neither post lends support to any explanation for why he didn't make any Xiangqi or Shogi variants.
In his 150 cvs, most of which were made during 2000-2003 in desparation before he left, Ralph Betza never made a Xiangqi and never made a Shogi variant. He had too much sense, thinking if they do not make Xiangqi variants in China much at all, why should westerners? Or Betza never did explicitly eastern cvs simply because he stayed on exactly 64 squares, another argument might run. For whatever reason the forbearance from designing narrow regional asian sub-forms, Betza did weigh in on them occasionally, having travelled to Japan. General background: http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=513. Respect for east asian Go: http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=888; the other 3 comments this thread show more Betza ideas especially on Go.
Betza in this repeat of comment stresses standard Go which is 19x19. http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=897 Sizes are interesting, for example, Scrabble's 15x15, past-standard Chess 8x8, TicTacToe 3x3. Betza speculates on different Go sizes such as 17x17. Of course we cannot equate constructions so different but make comparisons which aid in mental organization. To highlight another Betza comment: http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=513 It has one of the classic sentences in all the history of CVPage that rings true: ''Chess Variant people often like to make new rules more than they like to play the games; and often also they are less skillful at playing the games than they are at making the rules.''
Betza on Ultima variants: http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=237 The following Betza looks at history past and future. http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=513 Here coincidentally the challenge I just raised exists by Betza, to construct different fool's mates: http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=508 http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=507 And Crooked Queen is a Piececlopedia but there are more alternatives: http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=2074
RalphBetzaSpeaks thread here is for interesting Betza comments. http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=897 Looking for his words of Chess evolution and crippling weaknesses inherent in mere 64 squares stumbles on so many other Betzas on ranging topics. Specializing in 64-square CVs, Betza nevertheless objectively analyzed the modern problems of trying to sustain the traditions any longer. Above Betza wonders why there are so few Go variants. http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=920 http://www.chessvariants.org/index/displaycomment.php?commentid=125 First above Betza looks at Capablanca. Then second he looks at Bird, who was a near-champion and reviver of Carrera's.
8 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.