Check out Grant Acedrex, our featured variant for April, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Later Reverse Order Earlier
Reproduction chess. The Queen is pregnant. (8x8, Cells: 64) [All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
🔔Notification on Sun, Mar 24 11:10 AM UTC:

The author, Piotr Smagacz, has updated this page.


💡📝Piotr Smagacz wrote on Mon, Dec 18, 2023 05:54 PM UTC:

Updated the rules of the game and changed the way the Queen becomes pregnant.


💡📝Piotr Smagacz wrote on Sun, Oct 8, 2023 01:54 PM UTC in reply to Jean-Louis Cazaux from 12:05 PM:
I have tried so many times - I deleted the entire description and I still can't delete these submissions

Jean-Louis Cazaux wrote on Sun, Oct 8, 2023 12:04 PM UTC in reply to Piotr Smagacz from 11:08 AM:

To answer your last question, you have to edit the submission you want to delete, then you empty the different blocs that you may have filled previously, then you save it. Your submission should be empty at this stage and then it should be possible to delete it.


💡📝Piotr Smagacz wrote on Sun, Oct 8, 2023 11:08 AM UTC:

I have an idea for another modest variant, similar to Reproduction Chess, where the Queen can capture a friendly Pawn and then place it on the board. However, I cannot add it because I am limited by the number of open submissions.

I also can't delete old "Shift Tower..." and "Shift Summit..." submissions because I get the message "As a safety precaution, you may not use this script to delete a submission unless it is empty. Delete its content first if you mean to delete it.". I don't know how to remove them?


💡📝Piotr Smagacz wrote on Thu, Oct 5, 2023 06:05 PM UTC:

Updated


💡📝Piotr Smagacz wrote on Wed, Oct 4, 2023 07:42 PM UTC:
Small changes to the rules

Bob Greenwade wrote on Wed, Oct 4, 2023 01:15 PM UTC in reply to H. G. Muller from 06:55 AM:

H.G.'s point on excessive proliferation (what I call "the tribble effect") is a good one, if a little exaggerated. As a solution, I'd recommend using my suggestion of leaving the new Pawn behind in the space vacated by the Queen. Then, not only does it take at least two turns to make each one, but the player is limited to eight without also moving the King.

As for the double-step question, I'd suggest allowing it only for Pawns spawned in the first two rows, just to avoid confusion (since the "born" Pawns are presumably indistinguishable from the ones the player starts with).


H. G. Muller wrote on Wed, Oct 4, 2023 06:55 AM UTC in reply to Bn Em from Tue Oct 3 10:23 PM:

I see. Too bad.

As to the current variant: it seems to me that the Queen can produce new offspring at an alarmingly large rate, by keeping her next to the King, and give birth every turn. This might be so profitable that trying anything else becomes counter-productive, and the only viable strategy would be to accumulate Pawns until they completely fill the board, unless the opponent offers you something to capture.

To make this variant interesting it might be needed to slow down the maximum rate of reproduction a bit. E.g. requiring a turn to make a Queen adjacent to the King pregnant or to resolve a pregnancy, and only allow the latter to be done without moving the Queen, and when not adjacent to the King. Than the reproduction loop becomes: move next to King - get pregnant - move away - give birth - move back. So you would produce a new Pawn only every 4 turns. This is probably still fewer turns than you would need to gain a Pawn by ordinary play, so it might not even be enough to cure the problem.

Aslo here it is not clarified whether a newly born Pawn would have a double step, and if so, where.


Bn Em wrote on Tue, Oct 3, 2023 10:23 PM UTC in reply to H. G. Muller from 06:36 AM:

Fertile Queen is currently hidden as ‘unprocessed’, pending answers (which probably aren't coming, since it's been 3 years) to detail questions


Bob Greenwade wrote on Tue, Oct 3, 2023 01:52 PM UTC:

I agree with Aurelian. This is funny in its description, and could be a real hoot to play.

I'd tend to go with a version where the new Pawn (or even a Mann, promotable to Prince) is left behind in the space where the Queen just left. But that's just me. :)


H. G. Muller wrote on Tue, Oct 3, 2023 06:36 AM UTC in reply to Aurelian Florea from 06:15 AM:

I remember having seen a variant like this under the name 'Fertile Queen'. But I don't see it in the index here, so I am not sure where that was.


Aurelian Florea wrote on Tue, Oct 3, 2023 06:15 AM UTC:

This sounds funny!


💡📝Piotr Smagacz wrote on Tue, Oct 3, 2023 06:01 AM UTC:

My submission is ready


14 comments displayed

Later Reverse Order Earlier

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.