Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
Gilman (in Diverse Directions) names those pieces Mara and Capybara, the largest of the rodents (to go with the established Squirrel and his Beaver for Silverman's/Cazaux's Cheetah)
Related question: If the King/Mann/Commoner covers the first perimeter, the Squirrel/Bear/Centurion covers the second, and the Cheetah covers the third, what covers the fourth and fifth perimeters?
Originally the Chariot is the sense of the Rook, it is still that sense in xiangqi (where the sinogram also means "car").
Wow, that is an obscene amount of power for an 8x8 board... I'd expect all tactics and no strategy.
Also, every piece can move like a knight except the king. Since that's the only piece not augmented, maybe give him a knight's move too so he doesn't get checkmated too easily.
In my variant, Supercharged Chess, I called this piece the "Supercharged Knight", but another name could be the "Chariot". Here is my variant: https://www.chess.com/blog/HasanElias/supercharged-chess-a-chess-variant
Ineresting: in some medieval forms of chess (wich are closer to Shantraj) king could leap like squirrel on it's first move (castling evolved from this move). By the way, I am russian, but i did not knew that 'Bear chess' is popular in Russia before :) .
Does anyone rate these pieces?? I was thinking a squirrel might be worth 6.5 to 7.0 points -- similar to Grand Chess's Cardinal. Agree? Disagree?
has some interesting comments on the relative values of Rooks and other pieces - with the usual Kings on an 8x8 board. Ralph Betza (gnohman) states that the Knight+Dabbabah piece can force mate when the only other pieces on the board are the two Kings. Back before Zillions existed I also studied this (very tricky) piece and concluded that a Knight+Dabbabah piece is indeed sufficient mating material. This piece is one of Betza's 'Augmented Knights' - intended to be equal in value to a Rook. Clearly the Squirrel, which can move anywhere the Knight+Dabbabah can, is a more valuable piece.
In Ralph Betza's cspigs chess, this piece is worth six points. I'm not entirely sure that it is more powerful than a rook. It can cut off large swaths of board (effectively preventing a king from entering a collumn or row), but I haven't played with it enough to be sure it is worth the six points. For instance, if the opponent's 'King' was a royal knight rather than a royal commoner, the Squirrel would be somewhat less effective than a rook in the endgame, wouldn't it?
A fun little position, if I may. White- Ka2 Pa3,b2,c3 Black- SQb5 Rg2 Pa4 1...SQxc3 mate. featuring a nice pin.
In reply to Boris Badenov (is this his real name or a self-deprecating pun?), the Moose moves like a Grasshopper (http://www.chessvariants.com/piececlopedia.dir/grasshopper.html) but turns through 45º during the hop. A Squirrel and Moose would indeed be an interesting combination of a strong short-range piece and a restricted long-range one.
20 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.
That's helpful (and you have my thanks, Bn Em), but not as helpful as I'd hoped. Are there any others? Anyone?