[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments/Ratings for a Single Item
The FIDE Laws Of Chess. The official rules of Chess from the World Chess Federation.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]Can the King attack any time or only when he is in danger?
How many moves for the attacker, when an opponent (defender) only has his king left, before stalemate?
The game is drawn when the players see that both flags are down - and the position on the board is not checkmate. The general idea is: you should not win a game after your flag has fallen. Not even if you can prove that your opponent's flag must have fallen first.
It is a player's responsibility to point out his opponent's flag-fall.
White's flag has fallen but black does not notice. Black's flag falls and white points it out. With best play the position is drawn but both players have mating material (e.g. K,R vs K,B,P). No arbiter is present, but spectators know which flag fell first.
Question: what should the result be?
No, player B may not capture player A's King. Player A has made an illegal move and must take it back.
What happens when player A moves his King into a position where Player B can then capture him... therefore no one has said Check. Can player B then go ahead a capture Player A's King and win?
Calling, 'check' is not required. Making a mistake and saying 'checkmate' does not forfeit the game.
Hi, I'd like to settle an arguement I've have with my dad at chess. I mistakenly said 'checkmate' when it was actually 'check', there was one sqaure to which he could move his king. Does this forfit the game, he recons that it gives him a win since I declared the wrong term? I've looked at many rule books, but can find anything yet. Excellent website by the way! Thanks.
He is getting it mixed up with a Pawn. Rooks do not promote to anything at all in Chess.
Some guy I was playing said that if a rook gets to the opposite side of the board it is turned into a queen therefore he put me in checkmate is this a rule or is he getting mixed up with a pawn? Thank you
http://www.chessvariants.org/d.chess/faq.html
is the page for frequently asked questions concerning the rules of chess. Stalemate is one way to draw a game, the 50 moves rule (not 15) is another. Sometimes the 50 moves count starts anew - there is a second page covering more questions on the 50 moves rule.
This person may be confusing fifteen with fifty, as well as further garbling the fifty move rule. This rule says that a player may claim a draw if fifty moves have passed without either player checking a King or capturing a piece.
Question: recently, I played a game where my oppponent claimed a stalemate because he had only a bare king against my King Queen & 2 pawns. He said if I was unable to mate in 15 moves it was a stalemate. I've never heard of this - having to mate a bare king in 15 moves. Is there such a rule, even in tournaments or speed chess or some variant? BTW, excellent site & info.
i'm a recreational player, so i don't usually use a clock. what are the 'normal' times and number of moves for a regular match?
Love it!!!
I am wondering if the scoring of a stale mate differs from a draw? I don't believe it does, but would like to confirm.
too much information for a simple person learning to play chess for the first time. i recomend to just stick to general information
Lucious: In your example, after Black's move, his king is attacked by White's king. Black's move is therefore illegal (see Article 9.1).
I recently played a game of chess in which the two kings were two spaces
away from each other. The black king tried to move so that there was only
one space between it and the white king. I seem to remember once when I
was playing that the white king was forced to move away. However, I cannot
find this ruling in any of the websites that I have looked at.
If anyone could find out what the offical ruling for this situation is I would greatly appreciate an e-mail explaining the details, or stating that this was a made up rule. my e-mail address is luciousveyl@gmail.com
Very informative, and i really learn a lot, i love to play chess, i follow rules and regulation but some of my friends didnt notice their illegal moves so we fight, when we surf over the net, we found this site and right now, we are playing fair and square... THANKS,
John Jackson's question can be answered by considering how you actually make a complete move in a game of chess. [1] Move a piece to another square. [2] Remove your hand from the piece. [3] Using the same hand, press the chess clock. A 'fallen flag' is evidence that you have failed to complete your move in time. Remember, there is no legal distinction between being one second over the time limit and being one hour over the time limit. Attempting to add special rules like: 'When you checkmate your opponent, you do not have to press the clock' will make a complicated mess of things.
Greg Strong wrote on Mon, Jul 25, 2005 09:24 PM UTC:Ick. I cannot give an official answer, but I would ask this question: If the player being mated was watching the clock, and saw that the flag had fallen before mate was declared, then why did he not *immediately* say 'time up, you lose'? Or, if he did not see that the flag had fallen before mate was declared, how could he possibly say with any certainty that the flag had fallen before the mate was declared?!? My logical assessment of the situation would be that the mate should stand. But, I am not qualified to make an official ruling.
A speed game is being played. There is no arbiter on hand to watch the clocks. One player checkmates the other. The other player immediately says 'You're out of time and were before you 'mated me'. Does the ckeckmate stand? Of course if the second player said 'you're out of time before he was mated,the 'mate would not stand.
These are the best chess rules ever. I think I'll use them for my chess club.
Informative , provocative and quite interesting and helpful!!
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.