Check out Glinski's Hexagonal Chess, our featured variant for May, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

LatestLater Reverse Order EarlierEarliest
Feedback to the Chess Variant Pages - How to contactus. Including information on editors and associate authors of the website.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
M Winther wrote on Fri, Apr 16, 2010 12:52 AM EDT:
If you are a registered user you can submit chess variants using that form. Why don't you try.
/Mats

Anonymous wrote on Thu, Apr 15, 2010 06:53 AM EDT:
So how much time i need to wait before games i send are published? If they where not published for a long time, does it becessary means that my games are not suitable?

Anonymous wrote on Wed, Apr 14, 2010 12:26 PM EDT:
M Winther, read this: 'This form allows any person that has previously
submitted material that has been published on these pages, to post their
own pages'.
So, i can't use this yet.

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Apr 12, 2010 05:50 AM EDT:
M Winther, there is no my name here (i am registred).

M Winther wrote on Mon, Apr 12, 2010 02:07 AM EDT:
You must publish it yourself, using this form:
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/membersubmission.php
/Mats

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Apr 12, 2010 01:58 AM EDT:
I have send a pair of games rules by e-mail. How much time may pass before games become published?

Jack Nitch wrote on Tue, Dec 22, 2009 02:03 PM EST:
smess problem, trying to move ng7 to g6 and its saying ninny cant do that ?

Joe Joyce wrote on Thu, Dec 3, 2009 10:22 PM EST:
Hello, Martin. Email me and I'll try to get you set up. Click on my name on the left here, and use that email address. Joe

Martin wrote on Thu, Dec 3, 2009 05:22 PM EST:
Hi chessvariants team! I tried to submit a chess variant 'Perleberger Bridge Chess' via e-mail to the general contact address one month ago. Without a reply until now I'm afraid my e-mail got lost? Is there another way for newbies to submit content? Thanks in advance. :-)

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Tue, Nov 10, 2009 07:24 AM EST:
It is still checkmate.

ron forrest wrote on Tue, Nov 10, 2009 04:26 AM EST:
When an opponent puts you in checkmate but does not realize it and calls check, is it still checkmate or does the fact that he did not call checkmate have some bearing?

David Howe wrote on Sat, Feb 14, 2009 05:12 PM EST:
Hi Ray, I cannot find you in the database. What is your userid?

ray costello or trir wrote on Fri, Feb 13, 2009 08:55 PM EST:
please help me to log on as i am playing games with family. I think my pass word is 4716364? my e-mail is tririver@earthlink.net If my pass word is correct and/or incorrect please e-mail to confirm. Thank you.. ray costello.

Gary Gifford wrote on Fri, Jul 18, 2008 03:49 AM EDT:
If your King is in check you must do one of the following: (a) move your king out of check, (b) block the check (interpose), or (c) capture the checking piece or pawn. b and c do not work in cases of double-check and b will not work against knight checks.

You could not checkmate your opponent while leaving your own king in check.


Anonymous wrote on Thu, Jul 17, 2008 06:04 PM EDT:
I was playing a game of chess yesterday and my king had been put in check, but on my turn all i had to do was move my rook and then my opponents king would be check mated. Is it legal to check mate my opponent while i myself am in check?

SHANNON RENE GARDNER wrote on Mon, Jun 23, 2008 07:48 PM EDT:
I THINK YOU NEED TO CHECK OUT 3RDMILLENNIUMCHESS, YOU WILL FIND IT TO BE THE COMPLETION OF CHESS. GOOGLE IT AND GET IN TOUCH WITH SHANNON ,

Nevaka wrote on Mon, May 12, 2008 08:05 PM EDT:Excellent ★★★★★
So I was curious; why can a pawn, upon reaching the opposite side of the chess board, not remain a pawn? I personally see no reason why this should not be included in the rules. I might even go so far as to suggest the pawn be allowed to begin his trek back across to where he came from.

Jose Carrillo wrote on Mon, May 12, 2008 07:57 PM EDT:
Hi Admins,

A corrections for the What's New Page:
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/whatsnew.php

For the week ending May 14, 2008 there are two Game Courier Presets entries for Modern Random Chess.

The one that says Author Jose Carrillo, Inventor Gabriel Maura, is actually for Modern Chess (not Modern Random Chess). The other one is OK.

A request: for the informational page for MRC64, can you add the text description 'Modern Random Chess 64' next to the link? (just like it was done for the MRC64 Game Courier Preset entry).

Thanks.

Jose Carrillo wrote on Sun, May 11, 2008 09:59 AM EDT:
Admins,

Can someone please update the Query page on 'M' items below:
http://www.chessvariants.org/index/mainquery.php?type=Any&startswithletter=M&orderby=LinkText&displayauthor=1&displayinventor=1

to include the Modern Random Chess Game Courier preset:
http://play.chessvariants.org/pbm/play.php?game%3DModern+Random+Chess%26settings%3DMRC

Thanks.

Jose Carrillo wrote on Sat, May 10, 2008 03:32 PM EDT:
Thanks David.

I did my first contributions, the Modern Random Chess variant:

http://www.chessvariants.org/index/msdisplay.php?itemid=MSmodernrandomch

and the new Bishop Adjustment Rule:

http://www.chessvariants.org/index/msdisplay.php?itemid=MSthebishopadjus

David Howe wrote on Sat, May 10, 2008 01:51 PM EDT:
Jose, you are now a contributor. Please feel free to publish your variants...

Jose Carrillo wrote on Sat, May 10, 2008 08:32 AM EDT:
How does one become a Contributor to Chess Variants?

I have a new Bishop Adjustment Rule that I want to publish (next to Carlos Cetina's BCR rule), and I have 3 news variants that I've created that I also want to publish.

Brian Guo wrote on Sat, Mar 8, 2008 01:19 AM EST:Excellent ★★★★★
Why is there no 'maharaja' in the initial position?

Neo wrote on Wed, Feb 6, 2008 11:38 AM EST:Average ★★★
Not really so easy for a newb like me, so it defeats the purpose of learning, also, it is confusing as most of the time we can't trace the play the comp made, if we can't SEE the moves, again, how can we learn ? thanks

Anonymous wrote on Fri, Nov 16, 2007 08:25 PM EST:Excellent ★★★★★
Great site but you shoud know that the piece you call Mao is actually Ma. 
Ma is the Chinese word for horse, not Mao which can mean cat, feather or
hair, rivet and thick or dense, depending on the tone.

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Sep 17, 2007 06:52 AM EDT:Excellent ★★★★★

We have linked to your nice site.

http://www.chessvariants.com/shogi.html

We hope you may link to our site.

If linked, please send mail to us, how to find it.

==================================================================

ƒRƒ“ƒsƒ…[ƒ^‚ð—˜—p‚µ‚½«Šû‚̐¢ŠE The Shogi World with Computer

ŠÇ—ŽÒ –Lãài‚Æ‚æ‚݂݁j webmaster: Toyomimi

specadmin@specjp.com http://www.specjp.com

==================================================================


Dr Dave wrote on Mon, Aug 13, 2007 10:28 AM EDT:
Comment posted 2005: any thoughts since?

Dear Hans and colleagues

I was having a game of XiangChi with another member of our club and
dropped by to see what might be new on your site;
I'm so impressed with all the effort you have put in on the content and
quality of this and other games since I was last here.  Keep up the good
work!

I was also vastly impressed with the neat comments system.  Is that
something you've devised yourselves, or a package that you've found
somewhere?  I was just about to sit down with some colleagues here and
try
to implement something similar for our own website at work
(www.sheu.org.uk), but would prefer not to re-invent the wheel if I can
avoid it.  Is the PHP coding something you can point me to, or are
prepared to share?

Thanks very much


Dave Regis

david.regis@sheu.org.uk

May your pieces harmonise with your Pawn structure and
your sacrifices be sound in all variations

D _
 / '()/~    Dave Regis         &8^D* Exeter Chess Coaching Page etc.:
|| \_/|    = DrDave on FICS   http://www.exeterchessclub.org.uk/
~\   /                      '...what else exists in the world but
chess?'
 _|||__SHEU                  -- NABOKOV    'Contribute!' -- Doug Attig

ryan wrote on Tue, May 8, 2007 07:40 PM EDT:
i heard that you always have to trap the king in chess.if you put him in check and the opponent does not make the right move, can you just eliminate it with one piece?

Anonymous wrote on Fri, Mar 16, 2007 09:55 AM EDT:
COMMENT METTRE ECHECS ET MAT, ET CES CONSEQUENSE?

QUEYREL wrote on Fri, Dec 22, 2006 05:31 AM EST:
I would like to introduce you  wth a new chess variant and cannot!
here is the web site where you will find information : www.fortuit.fr
best regards to the whole team
Luc Queyrel : lqfortuit@orange.fr

Christine Bagley-Jones wrote on Fri, Nov 3, 2006 12:43 AM EST:
you are on the wrong page, you should read here
http://www.chessvariants.org/d.chess/chess.html

Anonymous wrote on Wed, Nov 1, 2006 03:18 PM EST:
Can you move a king to the opponents side of the board and redeem a captured piece?

Gary Gifford wrote on Sun, Oct 22, 2006 01:37 PM EDT:
Alison:  No.  The first capture ends the move.  Your question could also be asked of Queens, Bishops, and Rooks
 for non-diagonal (orthogonal) captures)... and even Kings.  In all cases, the single-capture ends the move.

Alison wrote on Sun, Oct 22, 2006 11:56 AM EDT:Good ★★★★

My question is:

Can a pawn capture two pawns if they are in a subsequent diagonal position. For example if there are 2 white pawns in 2 diagonal spaces can they be captured in one move with the black pawn moving 2 diagonal spaces in one go?


Abdul-Rahman Sibahi wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 06:49 PM EDT:
I sent an e-mail to the General Contact address (with a link to a Courier preset I made) and I didn't get a response till now. Hos long does it take to submit material for the first time ?

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Fri, Aug 4, 2006 10:08 AM EDT:
It is possible to have nine Queens in Chess. I already knew it was legal, and to find out whether it could actually be done, I just played a game against myself with the object of getting nine Queens for White. I got all nine Queens, checkmating Black only when I got the ninth Queen. Of course, this required lots of cooperation between Black and White, and in a normal game where both players are trying to win, it is very unlikely that either player will ever have nine Queens. But however improbable it will be in actual games, it is possible.

Stephen Stockman wrote on Fri, Aug 4, 2006 08:26 AM EDT:
why do u need 9 queens, 4 four queens will cover the whole board. no, u can never have 9 queens.

Stephen Stockman wrote on Fri, Aug 4, 2006 07:20 AM EDT:
Only if you are playing regicide rules in 4-Way Chess

Jeremy Good wrote on Fri, Aug 4, 2006 07:04 AM EDT:
Yes, but only if you also get out of check at the same time.

adam cook wrote on Fri, Aug 4, 2006 03:10 AM EDT:Average ★★★
WHEN YOU ARE IN CHECK ARE YOU ALLOWED TO ATTACK

inder wrote on Fri, Jul 21, 2006 02:38 AM EDT:Good ★★★★
can i have nine queen at some perticular time

Vijay Srinivas wrote on Tue, Jul 4, 2006 04:25 AM EDT:Good ★★★★
I dont understand much about the 'Mad Elephant Chess'. The one thing I dont understand is about taunting the mad elephant. Could it be described better?

piyushdadrwala wrote on Wed, May 24, 2006 02:35 AM EDT:Good ★★★★
very creative,about hexagonal chess,i am too creative i made a new chess in
which dinnasour will  play a part, as well as  ,i designe a unique karom.in
this regard pl help me from where we can patent?
piyushdadriwala
pkgdwala@rediffmail.com

SavageCHEZZ wrote on Sat, May 13, 2006 06:38 PM EDT:Average ★★★
I wanted to know, when can a person CANCEL a game. I and another individual started a game of CHESS. Well then he said he wanted more time per move, so asked the moderator of the site, her friend to CANCEL the RATED game. He did saying that he did not legaly move 4 moves, so she could CCANCEL.. How many moves untill Cancelation is possible.. I thought it was four moves total??

Gary Gifford wrote on Sat, May 13, 2006 09:36 AM EDT:
50 Move Rule - I was reffering to USCF and FIDE rules for standard Chess. There is no 'official' 25-move rule. A player can claim a draw when there is 'insufficient mating material.' When that is the case the game ends at that point, as a draw -- no continued playing for 25 or 50 moves... not even for 1 more move.

Stephen Stockman wrote on Fri, May 12, 2006 07:34 PM EDT:
yes, but in chess variants the rules are different for every game. Are u talking about USCF Tournament rules? Typically in friendly games people commonly play that if one player only has a king left u must check-mate him in 25 moves or its a draw.

Gary Gifford wrote on Fri, May 12, 2006 06:51 PM EDT:
The 50 move rule is a bit more than what was recently stated regarding pawn
movement.  The rule makes the game drawn, if

the last 50 consecutive moves have been made without the movement of any
pawn AND without the capture of any piece (or pawn).

Thus,when a piece is captured (or a pawn) the 50 move count must start all
over again.

M Winther wrote on Fri, May 12, 2006 12:40 PM EDT:
There is no such 16 move rule. There is a 50 move rule, however, which says
that a pawn must be moved within 50 moves, otherwise the game is declared a
draw.
--Mats

Avinash wrote on Fri, May 12, 2006 10:33 AM EDT:
TO. Whom so ever Concerned I have a doubt as; 1. I have a rooke and Queen but my opponent is having only Queen with some Pawns on Both sides. If it is not possible to finish the game within 16 moves, whether the game is DRAWN or Who is Winner? @. What is 16 move rule? I hope you will help me in this regard & oblige. Thanks & Regards Avinash

unknownwarrior wrote on Wed, May 3, 2006 08:30 PM EDT:
u forgot about pawn passon when your opponent fales to capture yur pawn with his own, you may move your pawn diagonnaly behind his,and capture it as ur next move

Jon P. Wearley wrote on Thu, Feb 16, 2006 11:14 PM EST:Excellent ★★★★★
Hello, I have patented a 4 way chess variant, Quad Kingdom Chess. You can research it at www.quadkingdomchess.com . I would appreciate your response and feedback. Thank you, Jon P. Wearley

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Thu, Jan 12, 2006 01:08 PM EST:
Actually, the Pinyin transliteration of 马 is mǎ, not ma. Although it is not the Pinyin transliteration of the word, the spelling of mao has long been common in fairy chess literature. There are several systems of Chinese transliteration besides Pinyin, and it may have come from one of these.

Christine Bagley-Jones wrote on Thu, Jan 12, 2006 08:41 AM EST:
lol ... we know ..

Chuck Norris wrote on Thu, Jan 12, 2006 01:36 AM EST:Excellent ★★★★★
The horse is called 'Ma' not 'Mao'

josh the posh wrote on Sat, Jan 7, 2006 06:19 AM EST:Poor ★
i want 2 play

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Mon, Dec 19, 2005 04:36 PM EST:
We don't have an email list, per se, and if we did, we would need your
email address before we could put you on it. We do have a Yahoo!
discussion group, which you can sign up for yourself. You will find it at


http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/chessvariants/

If you're interested in participating in the various activities of this
site, such as voting in polls, playing games online, and discussing Chess
variants, you can follow this URL and become a registered user:

http://www.chessvariants.org/onthese/membership.html

Valentino wrote on Mon, Dec 19, 2005 03:21 PM EST:Excellent ★★★★★
My 'Victoria Principal' and i love spending quiet  evenings martinique
style in (jacuzzi), playing chess.
Great Site!
place me on email list
Adam Clore
7459 buffalo Ave
Niagara falls, New York 14304

Ed Trice wrote on Tue, Dec 6, 2005 04:49 AM EST:
I am not sure where to put this. My bookmark for the Gothic Chess comment
areas points to dead space. Anyway, here goes:

=============

The 2005 Gothic Chess Computer World Championship will be held online this
year at the http://www.GothicChessLive.com website. Everyone is invited to
watch, and if you have written a Gothic Chess program, participation is
free! We have one candidate from Iran this year, so we can neither charge
an entrance fee nor award any prize money in case this person enters
and/or wins (USA citizens cannot transaction any money with Cuba, Iran,
and a few other countries.) All participants will be mentioned in an
article appearing in the June 2006 issue of the International Computer
Games Association Journal.

The 2004 event was reported on at the Chessville.com website:

http://www.chessville.com/GothicChess/ComputerWorldChampionships.htm

For rules and registration, as well as playing times and login
information, visit:

http://s13.invisionfree.com/Gothic_Chess_Forum/index.php?act=SC&c=5

Come watch the best programs play for the title of the world's best!

Andy wrote on Thu, Dec 1, 2005 07:42 PM EST:Good ★★★★
There is so much about the rules of chess that it is silly not to find anywhere the topic 'which player playes a white...is a winer always starts another and another game with whites..or oponents switch each time after the game...no mater of outcome of the game ??? I'm saying we switch my boddy wants to keep whites ater each win...help soleve this matter.. Andy

Jared McComb wrote on Sun, Nov 20, 2005 04:32 PM EST:
The only thing related to 'reclaiming a queen' in Chess is the promotion
of a pawn to a queen.  For this to happen, the pawn must reach the final
row of the board, from its owner's perspective - in other words, get your
pawn all the way to the other side of the board, and you can promote it to
a queen.

(Additionally, the term 'reclaiming' is a bit inaccurate here, because
it is possible to get more than one queen by doing this multiple times.)

jackiemawr wrote on Sun, Nov 20, 2005 01:32 PM EST:Good ★★★★
My husband and son love playing chess, but at the moment are having a debate about 'reclaiming a queen' is it a legal move, where does she start from, after reclaiming, all rules to do with the above. Please help.

Christine Bagley-Jones wrote on Thu, Nov 17, 2005 12:47 AM EST:
yes, it is a chess variant, called many names .. Also know as: Suicide
Chess, Losing Chess, Killer Chess, Take-all Chess, Giveaway Chess, Must
Capture Chess .. see here -->
http://www.chessvariants.org/diffobjective.dir/giveaway.html

Nova wrote on Wed, Nov 16, 2005 11:29 PM EST:
Yeah I have a question.
My sister came home, she has joined the Chess 'Team' at her school
recently, and she told us of this version of Chess she calls 'TAke It'
where the object of the game is to make your oppenent take all of your
peices off the board.
She was rather vague in the rules and its making me a little nuts. I was
wondering if a. you have heard of such a version, b. what it is called?
and c. if perhaps you knew more what the rules where?

Thanks!:D

Anonymous wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2005 10:41 PM EST:
how do i make the pieces move with my computer

Peter Aronson wrote on Thu, Nov 3, 2005 03:48 PM EST:
John, try Tezhi Luzhanqi, also known as Chinese Army Chess.

(zzo38) A. Black wrote on Thu, Nov 3, 2005 01:27 PM EST:
Quote:
I have recently bought a game of Chinese Army Chess from the internet. It consists of 50 tiles 25 which are red and an equal number of black tiles. I have have a copy of the rules, but I have no clue what the Chinese symbols mean on the pieces. Do you know where I can get pictures of the pieces with identity explanation of the Chinese symbols so that I can figure out what the pieces are and be able to play a game? Thanks for your help. John

It can be found on http://chessvariants.org/xiangqi.html

John wrote on Thu, Nov 3, 2005 01:11 PM EST:
I have recently bought a game of Chinese Army Chess from the internet. It consists of 50 tiles 25 which are red and an equal number of black tiles. I have have a copy of the rules, but I have no clue what the Chinese symbols mean on the pieces. Do you know where I can get pictures of the pieces with identity explanation of the Chinese symbols so that I can figure out what the pieces are and be able to play a game? Thanks for your help. John

Cliff Lundberg wrote on Thu, Oct 6, 2005 05:40 AM EDT:Poor ★
I'm mentioned under cylindrical chess. I'd like to update my e-mail address to: cliff_lundberg@inreach.com Thanks! Cliff

metalmaker01 wrote on Thu, Jul 14, 2005 11:46 AM EDT:Excellent ★★★★★
umm can a king take a pawn that has it in check if a castle is nearby so that my plan is worked out correctly or does the castle have to take it

David Howe wrote on Thu, Jun 16, 2005 01:17 PM EDT:
X., please try again. I made a slight typo in the code.

(zzo38) A. Black wrote on Thu, Jun 16, 2005 11:39 AM EDT:
When trying to update the index information of member-submitted pages, I get this error message: <b>Error performing query: Table 'chessvar_Test.WhatsNew' doesn't exist</b>

Tony Quintanilla wrote on Sun, May 29, 2005 03:53 AM EDT:
The Chess Variant Pages e-mail address has been changed, at least for now. I won't quote it here to avoid web trolling robots, but you can see it at this page. If you submitted something recently using the old editors' address, please re-send it. We may not have received it. Thanks!

(zzo38) A. Black wrote on Wed, May 18, 2005 11:52 PM EDT:
I can't post chess variant uses the page to automatically enter chess variants into the system.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Sat, Apr 2, 2005 08:09 PM EST:
My attempts to get this page to work properly with Netscape 4 have been unsuccessful. One reason for this was that Netscape 4 uses document.layers and document.layer instead of document.getElementById. But another reason was that I couldn't get Netscape 4 to set the values of elements, even using its peculiar DOM. So what I did was to program this page to mimic the effect of JavaScript being completely off when document.getElementById is not available in a browser's DOM. So Netscape 4 users will just get the full content with links that go to the appropriate sections. That being said, Netscape 4 is really an obsolete browser, and anyone who still uses it should be able to upgrade to something better.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Fri, Apr 1, 2005 09:54 PM EST:
I have just tested this page on web browsers I have on my Windows 95 computer, which I usually no longer use. It worked perfectly for Netscape 6.2, Internet Explorer, and Lynx. Lynx does not support JavaScript or CSS, but this page did degrade gracefully on Lynx. The only browser that did not work well was Netscape Communicator. Some of the JavaScript worked, and some didn't. Fortunately, part of what didn't work was the ability to hide parts of the page. So at least someone using this browser could view the entire content of the page. But links did not work, the CSS worked incompletely, and, as mentioned, text could not be hidden. I saw one error I know how to fix. I need to place a JavaScript comment before I end the HTML comment that encloses the JavaScript. But I can't fix anything until I get back to my other computer, since my ftp program on this one doesn't have the right information for logging onto chessvariants.org. As for Netscape Communicator, I think the main problem is that it uses a different DOM than Gecko. So, with information on the old Netscape DOM, I might be able to fix it by providing alternate code for Netscape Communicator. But it might not be worth the trouble. Even the Netscape homepage wasn't working well with this program, and I doubt it is still in much use, given that Windows 95 users can upgrade to Netscape 6.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Fri, Apr 1, 2005 07:50 PM EST:
I just used Web Developer to disable JavaScript on Firefox, and it works just as it should when JavaScript isn't running.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Fri, Apr 1, 2005 07:42 PM EST:
I now have it working perfectly in Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer, Opera, and Mozilla. I got the alternate anchors to work, so that when JavaScript is running, clicking on any link goes to the top of the table. This is the natural place you would want to set it at for maximum visibility, and once you click on your first link, it stays in place, because all relative links go to the same place on the page.

Thomas McElmurry wrote on Fri, Apr 1, 2005 06:23 PM EST:
Right now the behavior under Opera is what I would consider perfect. I actually prefer that it not jump to the top of the table, since this way the page stays where I put it. If I want to scroll to the top of the table, I can do that quite easily. But I might want to keep the top of the page visible, or the comments section, or whatever. If so, it's very annoying when every click forces me back to the top of the table. In short, the page is more flexible if it doesn't force one set of preferences on all its users.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Fri, Apr 1, 2005 01:55 PM EST:
I've updated it to work better with Opera, but there are still some problems. One is that the Contact Form, which this is supposed to replace, has an anchor named submit, and so does this page. Also, Internet Explorer says there are errors on the page, but I don't know how to get it to tell me what they are. The main thing I did was to put the various anchors inside NOSCRIPT tags and use JavaScript to place alternate anchors above the table, just underneath the Feedback heading. It is supposed to jump to that spot whenever you click on anything, but it is not jumping at all except for clicking on 'Submit Content', which jumps to the prior 'submit' anchor at the top of the page in the Contact Form. I'm thinking it is not recognizing the anchors I tried to create with JavaScript. Overall, it seems to be working well with Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Opera, but it is not jumping to the top of the table, which is what I prefer to happen.

Thomas McElmurry wrote on Fri, Apr 1, 2005 12:05 AM EST:Good ★★★★
'Good' is for the content and general usefulness of the feedback page. It would be 'Excellent' if the spiffy interface worked better.

Browsers running under Windows XP:

Opera 7.51 (my preferred browser): When the content is hidden (i.e. before I select an item or when I select an item which opens a submenu), a small rectangle of the lavender background color (#ddccdd) is visible. When I click on any item which opens a submenu, it jumps down the page, so that the line reading 'Written by...' is at the top of the screen. When I scroll back up and click on any menu or submenu item which doesn't open another menu, the appropriate content displays on the right, with the top of the #fedead-colored box aligned with the top of the screen.

Mozilla Firefox 1.0: As with Opera, a small lavender rectangle is visible, but with a different size, shape, and location. When I click on any menu item, the top of the screen neatly bisects the question 'What do you want to do?' and the appropriate content displays on the right.

Netscape 7.1: Behaves identically to Firefox. Not surprising, since Netscape is essentially Mozilla.

M$ Aieee! 6.0.2900.2180.xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158: The full content is visible as the page loads, and instead of the small lavender rectangle seen in other browsers, we have a larger lavender rectangle, whose height always matches the height of the visible portion of the menu tree, and whose width changes every time a different submenu is opened. Clicking on menu items sometimes causes the screen to jump vertically, but only slightly.

Browsers running on a Red Hat Linux system consigned to the 'care' of a Windows devotee:

Netscape Communicator 4.8: Reports two JavaScript errors as the page loads; I assume these are due to an obsolete browser running an obsolete version of JavaScript. The entire menu tree is immediately visible. Clicking on any menu item causes the screen to jump to a seemingly arbitrary point, with an apparent preference for the very bottom of the page. The content which should be associated with the various menu items is nowhere to be found.

Mozilla 1.0.2: When no content is displayed, there is a lavender rectangle at the far right of the screen. This rectangle is equal in height to, and aligned vertically with, the heading 'What do you want to do?'. It is also only slightly wider than this heading, and its width remains fixed when content is opened. Thus the text displays in a very narrow column, with much wasted space in the center of the page. The vertical positioning of the page is exactly as in the Windows version of Firefox.

Konqueror 3.0.5a-0.73.4: The menu tree expands and contracts properly, and clicking on any item causes the screen to jump to the top of the page (which is in my opinion the most sensible place to jump to if you have to jump somewhere). The content which should be associated with the various menu items is nowhere to be found.

General comments reflecting my taste in web design: The fancy JavaScript and CSS stuff would be great, if it worked flawlessly. But if the content can't be gotten to, or if navigating the menus causes jumping to nonintuitive points on the page, it's not worth it. Form should follow function. Also, since so few browsers make a serious attempt to comply with standards, any time you tune something for one or two browsers, you're probably breaking it for the rest.

Now, I only pretend to know HTML, and I know almost nothing about JavaScript or CSS, so forgive me if this is a stupid question: Why are HREFs and NAMEs necessary at all?


Greg Strong wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 07:50 PM EST:Excellent ★★★★★
Sweeeet!  All works fine now under IE.  That being said, I have heard so
many people tell me that they are running FireFox that I guess I should at
least look at it.

This new feedback page is excellent.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 07:39 PM EST:
The version I uploaded earlier today wasn't working too well with Internet Explorer. I did some debugging with IE, and now I have a version that is working well with both Mozilla Firefox and Internet Explorer. I haven't tested it on other browers. If anything's not working right, let me know, and let me know on which browser it is not working right.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 12:48 PM EST:
There is still a problem with jumping around, caused by using the same strings for submenu IDs and Anchor NAMEs. Apparently, IDs work as anchors just as well as NAMEs do. I'll fix this later.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 12:35 PM EST:
I have just made a major revision to the code and structure of this page. Most anchor names have been changed to make them better reflect the hierarchy of the document. The submenus have been moved to the main menu area, so that the top of any section shown will also be the top of the menu, thereby causing the page to not jump around so much. You get the menu and submenus on the left and the content on the right. If you don't have JavaScript, you will get the full menus and content at once. If you have JavaScript running, then parts will remain hidden until you choose to see them.

Greg Strong wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2005 09:07 PM EST:
IE 6.0. 'submit content' scrolls the screen a little, but it doesn't give me any additional options, like the others do.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2005 09:00 PM EST:
Okay, I think I know what you mean, Jared. It wasn't such a problem when I was testing the prototype, because I didn't have the full footer content, which caused the page to move around less. It is functioning this way so that it will remain useful on browsers that don't support JavaScript and CSS. I think I can do this by using JavaScript and the NOSCRIPT tags to write alternate versions of the links, but it will have to wait, as it is time for Alias.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2005 08:47 PM EST:
The 'submit content' option works on my browser, which is Mozilla Firefox. What browser are you using?

Greg Strong wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2005 08:41 PM EST:
Fergus, it works as you describe for me, with the exception of the 'submit content' option, which doesn't seem to do anything.

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2005 08:20 PM EST:
I don't understand your comments, Jared. To understand them better, I need to know what you're seeing. Do you just see a single list of options, or do you see the full content of the page? You're supposed to initially see only a single list of options, but if you don't have JavaScript and CSS running, you will see the entire content. When you click on an option, and assuming that JavaScript and CSS are enabled, you will see only the portion of the content that you clicked on a link for.

Jared McComb wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2005 06:46 PM EST:Excellent ★★★★★
The rating is for the new layout of the page.

One thing I find annoying about it, though, is the way the page instantly
jumps to a certain spot whenever you click on anything.  In my opinion, it
would be easier to navigate if it just sat where it was.

Doug Chatham wrote on Sat, Dec 11, 2004 11:07 AM EST:
11? No. See the first question in the <a href='http://www.chessvariants.org/d.chess/faq.html'>Chess FAQ</a>

benj wrote on Thu, Dec 9, 2004 08:03 PM EST:Excellent ★★★★★
chess players, help me i needed an answer, is there really a rule in chess that when an opponent have no more piece only his king, i must checkmate him within 11 moves or else it would be considered as a stalemate. please send me a reply on my email address.... benchoz@yahoo.com ...thanx

Tony Quintanilla wrote on Sat, Nov 20, 2004 02:27 AM EST:
Steve, this sounds like Ultima. See our page on that game.

Steve wrote on Fri, Nov 19, 2004 06:59 PM EST:Excellent ★★★★★
This is really freaky! I was taught a game by my uncle about thirty years
ago (im 43 now) called Martian Chess. The pieces were a Freezer
(upside-down rook), chamelion (bishop), coordinator (knight), long leaper
(queen), retractor (king) and Flanker (pawn), but all at the same time, no
normal pieces. It was one of the best games I ever played and I even taught
my kid and he thinks it's cool too.

This is the first time I've ever seen anyone that ever heard of this
stuff in my entire life. What a mind-blower!

Sincerely,
Steve

Steve wrote on Sun, Apr 25, 2004 04:53 AM EDT:Excellent ★★★★★
Discover 4-way chess and play vs. computer now at http://hometown.aol.com/taurusgaming/myhomepage/index.html

Laurent Dubois wrote on Tue, Apr 20, 2004 03:26 AM EDT:Excellent ★★★★★
here is a variant of chess:

http://membres.lycos.fr/laurentduboislaurent/zzchess.htm

playing chess on a draught board with the addition of a piece: the
'zig-zag', which can move as many cases as one wants horizontally or
vertically zigzagging.


Cordially
Laurent Dubois
http://www.laurentdubois.com

Raymond Reid wrote on Sat, Mar 20, 2004 08:21 AM EST:Excellent ★★★★★
Hello to all at Chess Variants,
                               The 2004 edition of the Chesmayne Chess
Dictionary is now back on-line at:-

           http://chess-dictionary-chesmayne.net 


Yours sincerely,

Raymond Reid.

Nick Wedd wrote on Wed, Apr 2, 2003 12:38 PM EST:
The page http://www.chessvariants.com/xiangqi.html gves the rules of
XiangQi, and works perfectly well with InternetExplorer.  But if I try to
read it with Netscape4, it automatically forwards me to the page 
http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=thechessvariantp&l=st1&search=chinese
chess&mode=books&p=15&o=1, which does not exist.

Nick

John Ayer wrote on Sun, Mar 23, 2003 10:50 PM EST:
Stephen Pribut's Rec.games.chess.misc FAQ are actually located at
http://www.drpribut.com/sports/chessfaq.html .

Glenn Overby II wrote on Fri, Dec 6, 2002 07:40 PM EST:
They're working hard on making everyone whole.  This is a brief excerpt
from a long explanatory message apparently sent to subscribers in
general...

---begin excerpt---
Any timed-out tournament and non-tournament games since midnight Thursday
will be restored automatically. Also, we will suspend tournament timeouts
until midnight on Tuesday. 

If you are a current member, we will add 2 days to your membership. Please
email sales@itsyourturn.com from the email address registered on your
account, and we will take care of this for you. Please allow a few days
for us to get to this request, since we are frantically trying to address
all the issues relating to this downtime.
---end excerpt---

100 comments displayed

LatestLater Reverse Order EarlierEarliest

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.