[ List Latest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments by JaredMcComb
Is it just me or is this contest in a coma?
I have one as well, but have used it so much that the low-quality included cardboard board is starting to fall apart. Not that I'm selling it, of course -- just be wary you may have to find someplace that will make custom gameboards to replace yours, if you find one used. (The pieces, on the other hand, are lovely. Quite heavy, plastic, and felt-bottomed. Very sturdy.) What's all this about selling the property rights? Hopefully someone interested in selling high-quality sets will purchase it -- in my opinion, Omega Chess is one of the best variants in existence!
What's going on, anyway? There's been no announcement of a second round of voting.
'Ostentatious Chess' sounds like a good name for an upcoming submission of mine. ;)
The links to Taratibu and veSQuj seem to be missing. Furthermore, the link to Shatranj Kamil 64 should point to http://www.chessvariants.org/contests/10/shatranjkamil64.html instead of where it does now.
When attempting to use one of the voting pages, I get a screenfull of the following: Warning: main(/home/chessvar/public_html/cgi-bin/rankedpoll/runpoll.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/chessva/public_html/contests/10/poll1-A.php on line 26 Warning: main(/home/chessvar/public_html/cgi-bin/rankedpoll/runpoll.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/chessva/public_html/contests/10/poll1-A.php on line 26 Warning: main(): Failed opening '/home/chessvar/public_html/cgi-bin/rankedpoll/runpoll.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/chessva/public_html/contests/10/poll1-A.php on line 26 Perhaps this should be fixed.
Roberto, I'd like to point out that as of right now, when one Googles 'chessvariants,' the first related page that comes up under the main listing is this Xiang-Qi page. If that isn't a good indicator of this game's popularity variant-wise, if not game-wise in general, I don't know what is. (Incidentally, a search for 'xiangqi' gives this page second in the list, and a search for 'xiang-qi' or 'chinese chess' gives it first.)
It may be helpful on each of the automated voting pages to have 'See Also:' links only to the games in that particular group.
Not to be nitpicky, but the plural of Pokémon is Pokémon. 'Pokémons' sounds rather odd, to me anyways. *has a brother who used to watch the cartoon all the time*
Promoter promotion is prohibited? Perfect. I personally prefer the prohibition of prehension of pieces by Promoters, as it places the promoters in a pacifistic position where their perilous promoting power is best placed in proximity to pieces of your own. Why pick off pieces when your position is productive for the other player?
Can Promoters capture? And can Promoters promote? If so, does a Promoter that promotes a Promoter which previously promoted pieces prolifically pay a pretty penny? Perhaps a pound? Perhaps in practice Promoter promotion proliferates profusely, as the Promoters are positioned in proximity preceeding each play's premiere.
Page updated. Ed, could you please provide your last name so you can be properly credited?
The comment directly below this one is mine. Oops.
Thanks for the offer! I'll email you ASAP. No, I don't have the Yonin page up -- in honesty, I haven't even started it yet. I may upload a quickie version using the new form, but don't expect it to be all that great. (It'll be an English resource, though, which is what matters, and besides, I can edit it later!)
Hey Greg, you lost your bet. ;) I'm 19. Sorry to be so late, computer troubles. Wow, y'all are geezers. :P
I'm just wondering, for those of you who consider yourselves active members here, how old are you? We all know Hans is in his 40s, but that's all. What kind of age range is this group in as a whole?
I had an idea very similar to this one ages ago but completely forgot about it! Good to see it being fleshed out.
I believe that what Mr. Nalls is getting at is that it almost seems that someone is trying to get SPC to do well in the contest by giving it lots of Excellents under different names. Admittedly, I had been wondering myself. I'm not pointing any fingers right now, but whoever it is seems to be getting a little silly. Dead men, after all, do not have internet access.
In the Credits, Etc. section, the 2 in '102' and the 3 in '103' should be superscripts.
I would think that it's based on Cartesian distance, as in Maximummer Chess.
Oops. Yes, the board is 10 by 10, although the document itself does not reflect that.
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.